I'm confused now :). I thought that's what I did, removing "mca_btl_mx.la" and "mca_btl_mx.so". This is the MX BTL plugin, right?
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Jeff Squyres <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote: > On Jun 29, 2012, at 2:14 PM, Yong Qin wrote: > >> Thanks Jeff for the doc. However I'm not sure if I understand your >> following comment correctly. If I remove the MX BTL plugins, a.k.a., >> mca_btl_mx.la and mca_btl_mx.so, I'm now getting errors of these >> components not found. >> >> [n0026.hbar:09467] mca: base: component_find: unable to open >> .../mca_btl_mx.la: file not found (ignored) >> [n0026.hbar:09467] mca: base: component_find: unable to open >> .../mca_btl_mx.so: file not found (ignored) >> >> And it still uses TCP BTL instead of MX MTL from what I can tell. Am I >> doing things wrong? > > Yoinks, I'm sorry -- that's not quite what I meant. I meant remove the *BTL* > plugin, not the *MTL* plugin. > > I.e., if *only* the MX MTL is there, there should be no conflict between the > two (per that bug you and George found), and you should be ok. > > -- > Jeff Squyres > jsquy...@cisco.com > For corporate legal information go to: > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > us...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
