I don't recall anyone ever asking for that before - the original people who wanted cpus-per-proc only cared about it at the job level, not the individual app. So it currently is a global value.
It can be modified, but it'll be awhile before I get around to it. On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Siegmar Gross < siegmar.gr...@informatik.hs-fulda.de> wrote: > Hi, > > if I start different programs on one command line, I can use different > options "-host" and "-np". > > mpiexec -report-bindings -host linpc0 -np 1 date : \ > -host sunpc0,sunpc1 -np 2 hostname > Fri Oct 5 07:37:25 CEST 2012 > sunpc0 > sunpc1 > > Only the last value counts if I use for example "-cpus-per-proc". > > mpiexec -report-bindings -host linpc0 -np 1 -cpus-per-proc 2 \ > -bind-to-core date : -host sunpc0,sunpc1 -np 2 -cpus-per-proc 1 \ > -bind-to-socket hostname > [linpc0:16121] MCW rank 0 bound to socket 0[core 0]: [B .][. .] > Fri Oct 5 07:37:42 CEST 2012 > [sunpc0:17789] MCW rank 1 bound to socket 0[core 0]: [B .][. .] > sunpc0 > [sunpc1:15007] MCW rank 2 bound to socket 0[core 0]: [B .][. .] > sunpc1 > > mpiexec -report-bindings -host linpc0 -np 1 -cpus-per-proc 2 \ > -bind-to-core date : -host sunpc0,sunpc1 -np 2 -bind-to-socket \ > hostname > [linpc0:16191] MCW rank 0 bound to socket 0[core 0-1]: [B B][. .] > [sunpc0:17824] MCW rank 1 bound to socket 0[core 0-1]: [B B][. .] > Fri Oct 5 07:37:56 CEST 2012 > sunpc0 > [sunpc1:15040] MCW rank 2 bound to socket 0[core 0-1]: [B B][. .] > sunpc1 > > Is this behaviour intended? How could I map and bind processes in > different ways on a command line without a rankfile, e.g. in the > following way? > > rank 0=linpc1 slot=0:0-1 > rank 1=sunpc0 slot=0:0 > rank 2=sunpc1 slot=0:0 > > Thank you very much for any reply in advance. > > > Kind regards > > Siegmar > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > us...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users >
