Our case is a single user expressing interest, and maybe long term mixing as we explore hadoop options, and would mix MPI+hadoop.
I would not go into the effort if it is non-trivial to add it to 1.6. Brock Palen www.umich.edu/~brockp CAEN Advanced Computing bro...@umich.edu (734)936-1985 On Nov 28, 2012, at 10:29 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > On Nov 28, 2012, at 10:06 AM, Brock Palen wrote: > >> I know java MPI bindings are in the development tree, and the FAQ states >> they are derived from the HLRS bindings (which I can't appear to find >> online). > > I don't remember exactly where we got them; the repository might not have > been public. I know we (i.e., Ralph) scoured around for quite a while before > settling on this particular set. > > IIRC, we might have gotten this set from our contacts at HLRS, and therefore > it might not be on the open web anywhere else. > >> Is it possible to take the bindings from the dev tree and build them against >> the 1.6 stable? If not what mpiJava bindings do you recommend? > > Officially, we will not be porting the Java bindings to the v1.6 tree > (because it's the stable tree -- no new features will be added). > > That doesn't mean it can't be done, however. I think the hard part was > figuring out the build system mojo for it, but that's now been done. > > If you have users with a genuine interest in using the Java bindings but want > to use them with v1.6, I might be able to put up a bitbucket based off the > v1.6 branch that includes the Java bindings. It would be great to get some > feedback on these (admittedly incomplete) Java bindings. > > -- > Jeff Squyres > jsquy...@cisco.com > For corporate legal information go to: > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > us...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
