On Dec 19, 2012, at 9:22 AM, Siegmar Gross wrote: >> I think the real shortcoming is that there is no Datatype.Resized >> function. That can be fixed. > > Are you sure? That would at least solve one problem.
Here's a first cut at a patch. I don't know if this is fully correct; I don't quite understand yet how baseSize is used in the .java files, but it seems incorrect to me. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
resized.patch
Description: Binary data