Not entirely sure - add "-mca rmaps_base_verbose 10 --display-map" to your cmd 
line and let's see if it finishes the mapping.

Unless you specifically built with an external libevent (which I doubt), there 
is no conflict. The connection issue is unlikely to be a factor here as it 
works when not using the lama mapper.


On Dec 21, 2013, at 3:43 PM, tmish...@jcity.maeda.co.jp wrote:

> 
> 
> Thank you, Ralph.
> 
> Then, this problem should depend on our environment.
> But, at least, inversion problem is not the cause because
> node05 has normal hier order.
> 
> I can not connect to our cluster now. Tuesday, going
> back to my office, I'll send you further report.
> 
> Before that, please let me know your configuration. I will
> follow your configuation as much as possible. Our configuraion
> is very simple, only -with-tm -with-ibverbs -disable-ipv6.
> (on CentOS 5.8)
> 
> The 1.7 series is a llite bit unstable on our cluster yet.
> 
> Similar freezing(hang up) was observed with 1.7.3. At that
> time, lama worked well but putting "-rank-by something" caused
> same freezing (curiously, rank-by works with 1.7.4rc1).
> I checked where it stopped using gdb, then I found that it
> stopped to wait for event in a function of libevent(I can not
> recall the name).
> 
> Is this related to your "connection issue in the OOB
> subsystem"? Or libevent version conflict? I guess these two
> problems are related each other. They stopped at very early
> stage before reaching mapping function because no message
> appeared before freezing, which is my random guess.
> 
> Could you give me any hint or comment?
> 
> Regards,
> Tetsuya Mishima
> 
> 
>> It seems to be working fine for me:
>> 
>> [rhc@bend001 tcp]$ mpirun -np 2 -host bend001 -report-bindings -mca
> rmaps_lama_bind 1c -mca rmaps lama hostname
>> bend001
>> [bend001:17005] MCW rank 1 bound to socket 0[core 1[hwt 0-1]]:
> [../BB/../../../..][../../../../../..]
>> [bend001:17005] MCW rank 0 bound to socket 0[core 0[hwt 0-1]]:
> [BB/../../../../..][../../../../../..]
>> bend001
>> [rhc@bend001 tcp]$
>> 
>> (I also checked the internals using "-mca rmaps_base_verbose 10") so it
> could be your hier inversion causing problems again. Or it could be that
> you are hitting a connection issue we are seeing in
>> some scenarios in the OOB subsystem - though if you are able to run using
> a non-lama mapper, that would seem unlikely.
>> 
>> 
>> On Dec 20, 2013, at 8:09 PM, tmish...@jcity.maeda.co.jp wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Ralph,
>> 
>> Thank you very much. I tried many things such as:
>> 
>> mpirun -np 2 -host node05 -report-bindings -mca rmaps lama -mca
>> rmaps_lama_bind 1c myprog
>> 
>> But every try failed. At least they were accepted by openmpi-1.7.3 as far
>> as I remember.
>> Anyway, please check it when you have a time, because using lama comes
> from
>> my curiosity.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Tetsuya Mishima
>> 
>> 
>> I'll try to take a look at it - my expectation is that lama might get
>> stuck because you didn't tell it a pattern to map, and I doubt that code
>> path has seen much testing.
>> 
>> 
>> On Dec 20, 2013, at 5:52 PM, tmish...@jcity.maeda.co.jp wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Ralph, I'm glad to hear that, thanks.
>> 
>> By the way, yesterday I tried to check how lama in 1.7.4rc treat numa
>> node.
>> 
>> Then, even wiht this simple command line, it freezed without any
>> massage:
>> 
>> mpirun -np 2 -host node05 -mca rmaps lama myprog
>> 
>> Could you check what happened?
>> 
>> Is it better to open new thread or continue this thread?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Tetsuya Mishima
>> 
>> 
>> I'll make it work so that NUMA can be either above or below socket
>> 
>> On Dec 20, 2013, at 2:57 AM, tmish...@jcity.maeda.co.jp wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Brice,
>> 
>> Thank you for your comment. I understand what you mean.
>> 
>> My opinion was made just considering easy way to adjust the code for
>> inversion of hierarchy in object tree.
>> 
>> Tetsuya Mishima
>> 
>> 
>> I don't think there's any such difference.
>> Also, all these NUMA architectures are reported the same by hwloc,
>> and
>> therefore used the same in Open MPI.
>> 
>> And yes, L3 and NUMA are topologically-identical on AMD Magny-Cours
>> (and
>> most recent AMD and Intel platforms).
>> 
>> Brice
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Le 20/12/2013 11:33, tmish...@jcity.maeda.co.jp a écrit :
>> 
>> Hi Ralph,
>> 
>> The numa-node in AMD Mangy-Cours/Interlagos is so called cc(cache
>> coherent)NUMA,
>> which seems to be a little bit different from the traditional numa
>> defined
>> in openmpi.
>> 
>> I notice that ccNUMA object is almost same as L3cache object.
>> So "-bind-to l3cache" or "-map-by l3cache" is valid for what I want
>> to
>> do.
>> Therefore, "do not touch it" is one of the solution, I think ...
>> 
>> Anyway, mixing up these two types of numa is the problem.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Tetsuya Mishima
>> 
>> I can wait it'll be fixed in 1.7.5 or later, because putting
>> "-bind-to
>> numa"
>> and "-map-by numa" at the same time works as a workaround.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Tetsuya Mishima
>> 
>> Yeah, it will impact everything that uses hwloc topology maps, I
>> fear.
>> 
>> One side note: you'll need to add --hetero-nodes to your cmd
>> line.
>> If
>> we
>> don't see that, we assume that all the node topologies are
>> identical
>> -
>> which clearly isn't true here.
>> I'll try to resolve the hier inversion over the holiday - won't
>> be
>> for
>> 1.7.4, but hopefully for 1.7.5
>> Thanks
>> Ralph
>> 
>> On Dec 18, 2013, at 9:44 PM, tmish...@jcity.maeda.co.jp wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> I think it's normal for AMD opteron having 8/16 cores such as
>> magny cours or interlagos. Because it usually has 2 numa nodes
>> in a cpu(socket), numa-node can not include a socket. This type
>> of hierarchy would be natural.
>> 
>> (node03 is Dell PowerEdge R815 and maybe quite common, I guess)
>> 
>> By the way, I think this inversion should affect rmaps_lama
>> mapping.
>> 
>> Tetsuya Mishima
>> 
>> Ick - yeah, that would be a problem. I haven't seen that type
>> of
>> hierarchical inversion before - is node03 a different type of
>> chip?
>> Might take awhile for me to adjust the code to handle hier
>> inversion... :-(
>> On Dec 18, 2013, at 9:05 PM, tmish...@jcity.maeda.co.jp wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Ralph,
>> 
>> I found the reason. I attached the main part of output with 32
>> core node(node03) and 8 core node(node05) at the bottom.
>> 
>> From this information, socket of node03 includes numa-node.
>> On the other hand, numa-node of node05 includes socket.
>> The direction of object tree is opposite.
>> 
>> Since "-map-by socket" may be assumed as default,
>> for node05, "-bind-to numa and -map-by socket" means
>> upward search. For node03, this should be downward.
>> 
>> I guess that openmpi-1.7.4rc1 will always assume numa-node
>> includes socket. Is it right? Then, upward search is assumed
>> in orte_rmaps_base_compute_bindings even for node03 when I
>> put "-bind-to numa and -map-by socket" option.
>> 
>> [node03.cluster:15508] [[38286,0],0] rmaps:base:compute_usage
>> [node03.cluster:15508] mca:rmaps: compute bindings for job
>> [38286,1]
>> with
>> policy NUMA
>> [node03.cluster:15508] mca:rmaps: bind upwards for job
>> [38286,1]
>> with
>> bindings NUMA
>> [node03.cluster:15508] [[38286,0],0] bind:upward target
>> NUMANode
>> type
>> Machine
>> 
>> That's the reason of this trouble. Therefore, adding "-map-by
>> core"
>> works.
>> (mapping pattern seems to be strange ...)
>> 
>> [mishima@node03 demos]$ mpirun -np 8 -bind-to numa -map-by
>> core
>> -report-bindings myprog
>> [node03.cluster:15885] [[38679,0],0] bind:upward target
>> NUMANode
>> type
>> Cache
>> [node03.cluster:15885] [[38679,0],0] bind:upward target
>> NUMANode
>> type
>> Cache
>> [node03.cluster:15885] [[38679,0],0] bind:upward target
>> NUMANode
>> type
>> Cache
>> [node03.cluster:15885] [[38679,0],0] bind:upward target
>> NUMANode
>> type
>> NUMANode
>> [node03.cluster:15885] [[38679,0],0] bind:upward target
>> NUMANode
>> type
>> Cache
>> [node03.cluster:15885] [[38679,0],0] bind:upward target
>> NUMANode
>> type
>> Cache
>> [node03.cluster:15885] [[38679,0],0] bind:upward target
>> NUMANode
>> type
>> Cache
>> [node03.cluster:15885] [[38679,0],0] bind:upward target
>> NUMANode
>> type
>> NUMANode
>> [node03.cluster:15885] [[38679,0],0] bind:upward target
>> NUMANode
>> type
>> Cache
>> [node03.cluster:15885] [[38679,0],0] bind:upward target
>> NUMANode
>> type
>> Cache
>> [node03.cluster:15885] [[38679,0],0] bind:upward target
>> NUMANode
>> type
>> Cache
>> [node03.cluster:15885] [[38679,0],0] bind:upward target
>> NUMANode
>> type
>> NUMANode
>> [node03.cluster:15885] [[38679,0],0] bind:upward target
>> NUMANode
>> type
>> Cache
>> [node03.cluster:15885] [[38679,0],0] bind:upward target
>> NUMANode
>> type
>> Cache
>> [node03.cluster:15885] [[38679,0],0] bind:upward target
>> NUMANode
>> type
>> Cache
>> [node03.cluster:15885] [[38679,0],0] bind:upward target
>> NUMANode
>> type
>> NUMANode
>> [node03.cluster:15885] [[38679,0],0] bind:upward target
>> NUMANode
>> type
>> Cache
>> [node03.cluster:15885] [[38679,0],0] bind:upward target
>> NUMANode
>> type
>> Cache
>> [node03.cluster:15885] [[38679,0],0] bind:upward target
>> NUMANode
>> type
>> Cache
>> [node03.cluster:15885] [[38679,0],0] bind:upward target
>> NUMANode
>> type
>> NUMANode
>> [node03.cluster:15885] [[38679,0],0] bind:upward target
>> NUMANode
>> type
>> Cache
>> [node03.cluster:15885] [[38679,0],0] bind:upward target
>> NUMANode
>> type
>> Cache
>> [node03.cluster:15885] [[38679,0],0] bind:upward target
>> NUMANode
>> type
>> Cache
>> [node03.cluster:15885] [[38679,0],0] bind:upward target
>> NUMANode
>> type
>> NUMANode
>> [node03.cluster:15885] [[38679,0],0] bind:upward target
>> NUMANode
>> type
>> Cache
>> [node03.cluster:15885] [[38679,0],0] bind:upward target
>> NUMANode
>> type
>> Cache
>> [node03.cluster:15885] [[38679,0],0] bind:upward target
>> NUMANode
>> type
>> Cache
>> [node03.cluster:15885] [[38679,0],0] bind:upward target
>> NUMANode
>> type
>> NUMANode
>> [node03.cluster:15885] [[38679,0],0] bind:upward target
>> NUMANode
>> type
>> Cache
>> [node03.cluster:15885] [[38679,0],0] bind:upward target
>> NUMANode
>> type
>> Cache
>> [node03.cluster:15885] [[38679,0],0] bind:upward target
>> NUMANode
>> type
>> Cache
>> [node03.cluster:15885] [[38679,0],0] bind:upward target
>> NUMANode
>> type
>> NUMANode
>> [node03.cluster:15885] MCW rank 2 bound to socket 0[core 0[hwt
>> 0]],
>> socket
>> 0[core 1[hwt 0]], socket 0[core 2[hwt 0]], so
>> cket 0[core 3[hwt 0]]:
>> 
>> 
>> [B/B/B/B/./././.][./././././././.][./././././././.][./././././././.]
>> [node03.cluster:15885] MCW rank 3 bound to socket 0[core 0[hwt
>> 0]],
>> socket
>> 0[core 1[hwt 0]], socket 0[core 2[hwt 0]], so
>> cket 0[core 3[hwt 0]]:
>> 
>> 
>> [B/B/B/B/./././.][./././././././.][./././././././.][./././././././.]
>> [node03.cluster:15885] MCW rank 4 bound to socket 0[core 4[hwt
>> 0]],
>> socket
>> 0[core 5[hwt 0]], socket 0[core 6[hwt 0]], so
>> cket 0[core 7[hwt 0]]:
>> 
>> 
>> [././././B/B/B/B][./././././././.][./././././././.][./././././././.]
>> [node03.cluster:15885] MCW rank 5 bound to socket 0[core 4[hwt
>> 0]],
>> socket
>> 0[core 5[hwt 0]], socket 0[core 6[hwt 0]], so
>> cket 0[core 7[hwt 0]]:
>> 
>> 
>> [././././B/B/B/B][./././././././.][./././././././.][./././././././.]
>> [node03.cluster:15885] MCW rank 6 bound to socket 0[core 4[hwt
>> 0]],
>> socket
>> 0[core 5[hwt 0]], socket 0[core 6[hwt 0]], so
>> cket 0[core 7[hwt 0]]:
>> 
>> 
>> [././././B/B/B/B][./././././././.][./././././././.][./././././././.]
>> [node03.cluster:15885] MCW rank 7 bound to socket 0[core 4[hwt
>> 0]],
>> socket
>> 0[core 5[hwt 0]], socket 0[core 6[hwt 0]], so
>> cket 0[core 7[hwt 0]]:
>> 
>> 
>> [././././B/B/B/B][./././././././.][./././././././.][./././././././.]
>> [node03.cluster:15885] MCW rank 0 bound to socket 0[core 0[hwt
>> 0]],
>> socket
>> 0[core 1[hwt 0]], socket 0[core 2[hwt 0]], so
>> cket 0[core 3[hwt 0]]:
>> 
>> 
>> [B/B/B/B/./././.][./././././././.][./././././././.][./././././././.]
>> [node03.cluster:15885] MCW rank 1 bound to socket 0[core 0[hwt
>> 0]],
>> socket
>> 0[core 1[hwt 0]], socket 0[core 2[hwt 0]], so
>> cket 0[core 3[hwt 0]]:
>> 
>> 
>> [B/B/B/B/./././.][./././././././.][./././././././.][./././././././.]
>> Hello world from process 6 of 8
>> Hello world from process 5 of 8
>> Hello world from process 0 of 8
>> Hello world from process 7 of 8
>> Hello world from process 3 of 8
>> Hello world from process 4 of 8
>> Hello world from process 2 of 8
>> Hello world from process 1 of 8
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Tetsuya Mishima
>> 
>> [node03.cluster:15508] Type: Machine Number of child objects:
>> 4
>>    Name=NULL
>>    total=132358820KB
>>    Backend=Linux
>>    OSName=Linux
>>    OSRelease=2.6.18-308.16.1.el5
>>    OSVersion="#1 SMP Tue Oct 2 22:01:43 EDT 2012"
>>    Architecture=x86_64
>>    Cpuset:  0xffffffff
>>    Online:  0xffffffff
>>    Allowed: 0xffffffff
>>    Bind CPU proc:   TRUE
>>    Bind CPU thread: TRUE
>>    Bind MEM proc:   FALSE
>>    Bind MEM thread: TRUE
>>    Type: Socket Number of child objects: 2
>>            Name=NULL
>>            total=33071780KB
>>            CPUModel="AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6136"
>>            Cpuset:  0x000000ff
>>            Online:  0x000000ff
>>            Allowed: 0x000000ff
>>            Type: NUMANode Number of child objects: 1
>> 
>> 
>> [node05.cluster:21750] Type: Machine Number of child objects:
>> 2
>>    Name=NULL
>>    total=33080072KB
>>    Backend=Linux
>>    OSName=Linux
>>    OSRelease=2.6.18-308.16.1.el5
>>    OSVersion="#1 SMP Tue Oct 2 22:01:43 EDT 2012"
>>    Architecture=x86_64
>>    Cpuset:  0x000000ff
>>    Online:  0x000000ff
>>    Allowed: 0x000000ff
>>    Bind CPU proc:   TRUE
>>    Bind CPU thread: TRUE
>>    Bind MEM proc:   FALSE
>>    Bind MEM thread: TRUE
>>    Type: NUMANode Number of child objects: 1
>>            Name=NULL
>>            local=16532232KB
>>            total=16532232KB
>>            Cpuset:  0x0000000f
>>            Online:  0x0000000f
>>            Allowed: 0x0000000f
>>            Type: Socket Number of child objects: 1
>> 
>> 
>> Hmm...try adding "-mca rmaps_base_verbose 10 -mca
>> ess_base_verbose
>> 5"
>> to
>> your cmd line and let's see what it thinks it found.
>> 
>> On Dec 18, 2013, at 6:55 PM, tmish...@jcity.maeda.co.jp
>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Hi, I report one more problem with openmpi-1.7.4rc1,
>> which is more serious.
>> 
>> For our 32 core nodes(AMD magny cours based) which has
>> 8 numa-nodes, "-bind-to numa" does not work. Without
>> this option, it works. For your infomation, at the
>> bottom of this mail, I added the lstopo information
>> of the node.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Tetsuya Mishima
>> 
>> [mishima@manage ~]$ qsub -I -l nodes=1:ppn=32
>> qsub: waiting for job 8352.manage.cluster to start
>> qsub: job 8352.manage.cluster ready
>> 
>> [mishima@node03 demos]$ mpirun -np 8 -report-bindings
>> -bind-to
>> numa
>> myprog
>> [node03.cluster:15316] [[37582,0],0] bind:upward target
>> NUMANode
>> type
>> Machine
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> A request was made to bind to NUMA, but an appropriate
>> target
>> could
>> not
>> be found on node node03.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> [mishima@node03 ~]$ cd ~/Desktop/openmpi-1.7/demos/
>> [mishima@node03 demos]$ mpirun -np 8 -report-bindings myprog
>> [node03.cluster:15282] MCW rank 2 bound to socket 1[core 8
>> [hwt
>> 0]]:
>> [./././././././.][B/././././././.][./././././././.][
>> ./././././././.]>>>>>>>>>>>> [node03.cluster:15282] MCW rank
>> 3 bound to socket 1[core 9[hwt
>> 0]]:
>> [./././././././.][./B/./././././.][./././././././.][
>> ./././././././.]
>> [node03.cluster:15282] MCW rank 4 bound to socket 2[core 16
>> [hwt
>> 0]]:
>> [./././././././.][./././././././.][B/././././././.]
>> [./././././././.]
>> [node03.cluster:15282] MCW rank 5 bound to socket 2[core 17
>> [hwt
>> 0]]:
>> [./././././././.][./././././././.][./B/./././././.]
>> [./././././././.]
>> [node03.cluster:15282] MCW rank 6 bound to socket 3[core 24
>> [hwt
>> 0]]:
>> [./././././././.][./././././././.][./././././././.]
>> [B/././././././.]
>> [node03.cluster:15282] MCW rank 7 bound to socket 3[core 25
>> [hwt
>> 0]]:
>> [./././././././.][./././././././.][./././././././.]
>> [./B/./././././.]
>> [node03.cluster:15282] MCW rank 0 bound to socket 0[core 0
>> [hwt
>> 0]]:
>> [B/././././././.][./././././././.][./././././././.][
>> ./././././././.]
>> [node03.cluster:15282] MCW rank 1 bound to socket 0[core 1
>> [hwt
>> 0]]:
>> [./B/./././././.][./././././././.][./././././././.][
>> ./././././././.]
>> Hello world from process 2 of 8
>> Hello world from process 5 of 8
>> Hello world from process 4 of 8
>> Hello world from process 3 of 8>>>>>>>>>> Hello world from
>> process 1 of 8
>> Hello world from process 7 of 8
>> Hello world from process 6 of 8
>> Hello world from process 0 of 8
>> [mishima@node03 demos]$ ~/opt/hwloc/bin/lstopo-no-graphics
>> Machine (126GB)
>> Socket L#0 (32GB)
>> NUMANode L#0 (P#0 16GB) + L3 L#0 (5118KB)
>> L2 L#0 (512KB) + L1d L#0 (64KB) + L1i L#0 (64KB) + Core L#0
>> +
>> PU
>> L#0
>> (P#0)
>> L2 L#1 (512KB) + L1d L#1 (64KB) + L1i L#1 (64KB) + Core L#1
>> +
>> PU
>> L#1
>> (P#1)
>> L2 L#2 (512KB) + L1d L#2 (64KB) + L1i L#2 (64KB) + Core L#2
>> +
>> PU
>> L#2
>> (P#2)
>> L2 L#3 (512KB) + L1d L#3 (64KB) + L1i L#3 (64KB) + Core L#3
>> +
>> PU
>> L#3
>> (P#3)
>> NUMANode L#1 (P#1 16GB) + L3 L#1 (5118KB)
>> L2 L#4 (512KB) + L1d L#4 (64KB) + L1i L#4 (64KB) + Core L#4
>> +
>> PU
>> L#4
>> (P#4)
>> L2 L#5 (512KB) + L1d L#5 (64KB) + L1i L#5 (64KB) + Core L#5
>> +
>> PU
>> L#5
>> (P#5)
>> L2 L#6 (512KB) + L1d L#6 (64KB) + L1i L#6 (64KB) + Core L#6
>> +
>> PU
>> L#6
>> (P#6)
>> L2 L#7 (512KB) + L1d L#7 (64KB) + L1i L#7 (64KB) + Core L#7
>> +
>> PU>>>>>> L#7
>> (P#7)
>> Socket L#1 (32GB)
>> NUMANode L#2 (P#6 16GB) + L3 L#2 (5118KB)
>> L2 L#8 (512KB) + L1d L#8 (64KB) + L1i L#8 (64KB) + Core L#8
>> +
>> PU
>> L#8
>> (P#8)
>> L2 L#9 (512KB) + L1d L#9 (64KB) + L1i L#9 (64KB) + Core L#9
>> +
>> PU
>> L#9
>> (P#9)
>> L2 L#10 (512KB) + L1d L#10 (64KB) + L1i L#10 (64KB) + Core
>> L#10
>> +
>> PU
>> L#10 (P#10)
>> L2 L#11 (512KB) + L1d L#11 (64KB) + L1i L#11 (64KB) + Core
>> L#11
>> +
>> PU
>> L#11 (P#11)
>> NUMANode L#3 (P#7 16GB) + L3 L#3 (5118KB)
>> L2 L#12 (512KB) + L1d L#12 (64KB) + L1i L#12 (64KB) + Core
>> L#12
>> +
>> PU
>> L#12 (P#12)
>> L2 L#13 (512KB) + L1d L#13 (64KB) + L1i L#13 (64KB) + Core
>> L#13
>> +
>> PU
>> L#13 (P#13)
>> L2 L#14 (512KB) + L1d L#14 (64KB) + L1i L#14 (64KB) + Core
>> L#14
>> +
>> PU
>> L#14 (P#14)
>> L2 L#15 (512KB) + L1d L#15 (64KB) + L1i L#15 (64KB) + Core
>> L#15
>> +
>> PU
>> L#15 (P#15)
>> Socket L#2 (32GB)
>> NUMANode L#4 (P#4 16GB) + L3 L#4 (5118KB)
>> L2 L#16 (512KB) + L1d L#16 (64KB) + L1i L#16 (64KB) + Core
>> L#16
>> +
>> PU
>> L#16 (P#16)
>> L2 L#17 (512KB) + L1d L#17 (64KB) + L1i L#17 (64KB) + Core
>> L#17
>> +
>> PU
>> L#17 (P#17)> >>>>>    L2 L#18 (512KB) + L1d L#18 (64KB) +
>> L1i
>> L#18 (64KB) + Core L#18
>> +
>> PU
>> L#18 (P#18)
>> L2 L#19 (512KB) + L1d L#19 (64KB) + L1i L#19 (64KB) + Core
>> L#19
>> +
>> PU
>> L#19 (P#19)
>> NUMANode L#5 (P#5 16GB) + L3 L#5 (5118KB)
>> L2 L#20 (512KB) + L1d L#20 (64KB) + L1i L#20 (64KB) + Core
>> L#20
>> +
>> PU
>> L#20 (P#20)
>> L2 L#21 (512KB) + L1d L#21 (64KB) + L1i L#21 (64KB) + Core
>> L#21
>> +
>> PU
>> L#21 (P#21)
>> L2 L#22 (512KB) + L1d L#22 (64KB) + L1i L#22 (64KB) + Core
>> L#22
>> +
>> PU
>> L#22 (P#22)
>> L2 L#23 (512KB) + L1d L#23 (64KB) + L1i L#23 (64KB) + Core
>> L#23
>> +
>> PU
>> L#23 (P#23)
>> Socket L#3 (32GB)
>> NUMANode L#6 (P#2 16GB) + L3 L#6 (5118KB)
>> L2 L#24 (512KB) + L1d L#24 (64KB) + L1i L#24 (64KB) + Core
>> L#24
>> +
>> PU
>> L#24 (P#24)>>>>>    L2 L#25 (512KB) + L1d L#25 (64KB) + L1i
>> L#25
>> (64KB) + Core L#25 +
>> PU
>> L#25 (P#25)
>> L2 L#26 (512KB) + L1d L#26 (64KB) + L1i L#26 (64KB) + Core
>> L#26
>> +
>> PU
>> L#26 (P#26)
>> L2 L#27 (512KB) + L1d L#27 (64KB) + L1i L#27 (64KB) + Core
>> L#27
>> +
>> PU
>> L#27 (P#27)
>> NUMANode L#7 (P#3 16GB) + L3 L#7 (5118KB)
>> L2 L#28 (512KB) + L1d L#28 (64KB) + L1i L#28 (64KB) + Core
>> L#28
>> +
>> PU
>> L#28 (P#28)
>> L2 L#29 (512KB) + L1d L#29 (64KB) + L1i L#29 (64KB) + Core
>> L#29
>> +
>> PU
>> L#29 (P#29)
>> L2 L#30 (512KB) + L1d L#30 (64KB) + L1i L#30 (64KB) + Core
>> L#30
>> +
>> PU
>> L#30 (P#30)
>> L2 L#31 (512KB) + L1d L#31 (64KB) + L1i L#31 (64KB) + Core
>> L#31
>> +
>> PU
>> L#31 (P#31)
>> HostBridge L#0
>> PCIBridge
>> PCI 14e4:1639
>>   Net L#0 "eth0"
>> PCI 14e4:1639
>>   Net L#1 "eth1"
>> PCIBridge
>> PCI 14e4:1639
>>   Net L#2 "eth2"
>> PCI 14e4:1639
>>   Net L#3 "eth3"
>> PCIBridge
>> PCIBridge
>>   PCIBridge
>>     PCI 1000:0072
>>       Block L#4 "sdb"
>>       Block L#5 "sda"
>> PCI 1002:4390
>> Block L#6 "sr0"
>> PCIBridge
>> PCI 102b:0532
>> HostBridge L#7
>> PCIBridge
>> PCI 15b3:6274
>>   Net L#7 "ib0"
>>   OpenFabrics L#8 "mthca0"
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> us...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> us...@open-mpi.org>>
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> us...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> us...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> us...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> us...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> us...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> us...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> us...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> us...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> us...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> us...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> us...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> us...@open-mpi.org
>> 
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users_______________________________________________
> 
>> users mailing list
>> users@open-mpi.orghttp://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> us...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users

Reply via email to