Hi, Here is a very simple patch, but Ralph might have a different idea. So I'd like him to decide how to treat it. As far as I checked, I believe it has no side effect.
(See attached file: patch.bind-to-none) Tetsuya > Hi, > > Am 27.08.2014 um 09:57 schrieb Tetsuya Mishima: > > > Hi Reuti and Ralph, > > > > How do you think if we accept bind-to none option even when the pe=N option is provided? > > > > just like: > > mpirun -map-by slot:pe=N -bind-to none ./inverse > > Yes, this would be ok to cover all cases. > > -- Reuti > > > > If yes, it's easy for me to make a patch. > > > > Tetsuya > > > > ---- > > Tetsuya Mishima tmish...@jcity.maeda.co.jp > > _______________________________________________ > > users mailing list > > us...@open-mpi.org > > Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users > > Link to this post: http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2014/08/25161.php > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > us...@open-mpi.org > Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users > Link to this post: http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2014/08/25162.php
patch.bind-to-none
Description: Binary data
