On Nov 28, 2014, at 11:58 AM, George Bosilca <bosi...@icl.utk.edu> wrote:
> The same functionality can be trivially achieved at the user level using > Adam's approach. If we provide a shortcut in Open MPI, we should emphasize > this is an MPI extension, and offer the opportunity to other MPI to provide a > compatible support Are you referring to something Adam Moody proposed? Or some other Adam? > Thus, I would name all new types MPIX_ instead of OMPI_ and remove them from > the default mpi.h (or "include mpi") to force the users to use mpiext.h and > "include mpiext" in order to be able to access them. FWIW, we've traditionally named Open MPI-specific extensions "OMPI_" instead of "MPIX_" (which can be confused with other MPI implementation extensions). -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
