Tarball now available on web site
http://www.open-mpi.org/nightly/v1.8/ <http://www.open-mpi.org/nightly/v1.8/> > On Dec 10, 2014, at 9:40 AM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote: > > I’ll run the tarball generator now so you can try the nightly tarball. > >> On Dec 10, 2014, at 9:20 AM, Eric Chamberland >> <eric.chamberl...@giref.ulaval.ca> wrote: >> >> On 12/10/2014 10:40 AM, Ralph Castain wrote: >>> You should be able to apply the patch - I don’t think that section of >>> code differs from what is in the 1.8 repo. >> >> it compiles, link, but gives me a segmentation violation now: >> >> #0 0x00007f1827b00e91 in mca_allocator_component_lookup () from >> /opt/openmpi-1.8.3_patchyield/lib64/libmpi.so.1 >> #1 0x00007f1821aee378 in mca_pml_ob1_component_init () from >> /opt/openmpi-1.8_git_opt/lib64/openmpi/mca_pml_ob1.so >> #2 0x00007f182cd72141 in mca_pml_base_select () from >> /opt/openmpi-1.8_git_opt/lib64/libmpi.so.0 >> #3 0x00007f182cd22610 in ompi_mpi_init () from >> /opt/openmpi-1.8_git_opt/lib64/libmpi.so.0 >> #4 0x00007f182cd428b6 in PMPI_Init_thread () from >> /opt/openmpi-1.8_git_opt/lib64/libmpi.so.0 >> #5 0x00007f182f03db9c in PetscInitialize (argc=0x7fffb4ca28ec, >> args=0x7fffb4ca28e0, file=0x0, help=0x0) at >> /home/mefpp_ericc/petsc-3.5.2/src/sys/objects/pinit.c:781 >> #6 0x00007f183492b2bc in PETScInitialisation::PETScInitialisation >> (this=0x7fffb4ca33f0, pArgc=0x7fffb4ca28ec, pArgv=0x7fffb4ca28e0) at >> /home/mefpp_ericc/GIREF/src/commun/Petsc/PETScInitialisation.cc:122 >> #7 0x00000000004d8888 in main (pArgc=12, pArgv=0x7fffb4ca42b8) at >> /home/mefpp_ericc/GIREF/app/src/Test.Parallele/Test.PAScatter.cc:72 >> >> >>> >>> The sha for 1.8.3 can be found on the web site (see right-most column in >>> table): >>> >>> http://www.open-mpi.org/software/ompi/v1.8/ >> >> I see them, but can't find these into the git repo... I meant: where are >> stocked the git SHAs for each releases? *Forgive-me*, just found the >> "ompi-release" repo... sorry... >> >> I would like to see if a4fff57720 (ompi) is included in ompi-release? (It >> seems not). >> >> Should it be applied too? > > Don’t know - let me see > >> >> Eric >> >
