My fault, I thought the tar ball name looked funny :-)

Will try again tomorrow

Andy

--
Andy Riebs
andy.ri...@hp.com


-------- Original message --------
From: Ralph Castain
Date:04/12/2015 3:10 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: Open MPI Users
Subject: Re: [OMPI users] Problems using Open MPI 1.8.4 OSHMEM on Intel Xeon 
Phi/MIC

Sorry about that - I hadn’t brought it over to the 1.8 branch yet. I’ve done so 
now, which means the ERROR_LOG shouldn’t show up any more. It won’t fix the 
memheap problem, though.

You might try adding “--mca memheap_base_verbose 100” to your cmd line so we 
can see why none of the memheap components are being selected.


On Apr 12, 2015, at 11:30 AM, Andy Riebs 
<andy.ri...@hp.com<mailto:andy.ri...@hp.com>> wrote:

Hi Ralph,

Here's the output with 
openmpi-v1.8.4-202-gc2da6a5.tar.bz2<https://www.open-mpi.org/nightly/v1.8/openmpi-v1.8.4-202-gc2da6a5.tar.bz2>:

$ shmemrun -H localhost -N 2 --mca sshmem mmap  --mca plm_base_verbose 5 
$PWD/mic.out
[atl1-01-mic0:190189] mca:base:select:(  plm) Querying component [rsh]
[atl1-01-mic0:190189] [[INVALID],INVALID] plm:rsh_lookup on agent ssh : rsh 
path NULL
[atl1-01-mic0:190189] mca:base:select:(  plm) Query of component [rsh] set 
priority to 10
[atl1-01-mic0:190189] mca:base:select:(  plm) Querying component [isolated]
[atl1-01-mic0:190189] mca:base:select:(  plm) Query of component [isolated] set 
priority to 0
[atl1-01-mic0:190189] mca:base:select:(  plm) Querying component [slurm]
[atl1-01-mic0:190189] mca:base:select:(  plm) Skipping component [slurm]. Query 
failed to return a module
[atl1-01-mic0:190189] mca:base:select:(  plm) Selected component [rsh]
[atl1-01-mic0:190189] plm:base:set_hnp_name: initial bias 190189 nodename hash 
4121194178
[atl1-01-mic0:190189] plm:base:set_hnp_name: final jobfam 32137
[atl1-01-mic0:190189] [[32137,0],0] plm:rsh_setup on agent ssh : rsh path NULL
[atl1-01-mic0:190189] [[32137,0],0] plm:base:receive start comm
[atl1-01-mic0:190189] [[32137,0],0] plm:base:setup_job
[atl1-01-mic0:190189] [[32137,0],0] plm:base:setup_vm
[atl1-01-mic0:190189] [[32137,0],0] plm:base:setup_vm creating map
[atl1-01-mic0:190189] [[32137,0],0] setup:vm: working unmanaged allocation
[atl1-01-mic0:190189] [[32137,0],0] using dash_host
[atl1-01-mic0:190189] [[32137,0],0] checking node atl1-01-mic0
[atl1-01-mic0:190189] [[32137,0],0] ignoring myself
[atl1-01-mic0:190189] [[32137,0],0] plm:base:setup_vm only HNP in allocation
[atl1-01-mic0:190189] [[32137,0],0] complete_setup on job [32137,1]
[atl1-01-mic0:190189] [[32137,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Not found in file 
base/plm_base_launch_support.c at line 440
[atl1-01-mic0:190189] [[32137,0],0] plm:base:launch_apps for job [32137,1]
[atl1-01-mic0:190189] [[32137,0],0] plm:base:launch wiring up iof for job 
[32137,1]
[atl1-01-mic0:190189] [[32137,0],0] plm:base:launch [32137,1] registered
[atl1-01-mic0:190189] [[32137,0],0] plm:base:launch job [32137,1] is not a 
dynamic spawn
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
It looks like SHMEM_INIT failed for some reason; your parallel process is
likely to abort.  There are many reasons that a parallel process can
fail during SHMEM_INIT; some of which are due to configuration or environment
problems.  This failure appears to be an internal failure; here's some
additional information (which may only be relevant to an Open SHMEM
developer):

  mca_memheap_base_select() failed
  --> Returned "Error" (-1) instead of "Success" (0)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
[atl1-01-mic0:190191] Error: pshmem_init.c:61 - shmem_init() SHMEM failed to 
initialize - aborting
[atl1-01-mic0:190192] Error: pshmem_init.c:61 - shmem_init() SHMEM failed to 
initialize - aborting
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHMEM_ABORT was invoked on rank 1 (pid 190192, host=atl1-01-mic0) with 
errorcode -1.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
A SHMEM process is aborting at a time when it cannot guarantee that all
of its peer processes in the job will be killed properly.  You should
double check that everything has shut down cleanly.

Local host: atl1-01-mic0
PID:        190192
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
Primary job  terminated normally, but 1 process returned
a non-zero exit code.. Per user-direction, the job has been aborted.
-------------------------------------------------------
[atl1-01-mic0:190189] [[32137,0],0] plm:base:orted_cmd sending orted_exit 
commands
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
shmemrun detected that one or more processes exited with non-zero status, thus 
causing
the job to be terminated. The first process to do so was:

  Process name: [[32137,1],0]
  Exit code:    255
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
[atl1-01-mic0:190189] 1 more process has sent help message 
help-shmem-runtime.txt / shmem_init:startup:internal-failure
[atl1-01-mic0:190189] Set MCA parameter "orte_base_help_aggregate" to 0 to see 
all help / error messages
[atl1-01-mic0:190189] 1 more process has sent help message help-shmem-api.txt / 
shmem-abort
[atl1-01-mic0:190189] 1 more process has sent help message 
help-shmem-runtime.txt / oshmem shmem abort:cannot guarantee all killed
[atl1-01-mic0:190189] [[32137,0],0] plm:base:receive stop comm


On 04/11/2015 07:41 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
Got it - thanks. I fixed that ERROR_LOG issue (I think- please verify). I 
suspect the memheap issue relates to something else, but I probably need to let 
the OSHMEM folks comment on it


On Apr 11, 2015, at 9:52 AM, Andy Riebs 
<andy.ri...@hp.com<mailto:andy.ri...@hp.com>> wrote:

Everything is built on the Xeon side, with the icc "-mmic" switch. I then ssh 
into one of the PHIs, and run shmemrun from there.


On 04/11/2015 12:00 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
Let me try to understand the setup a little better. Are you running shmemrun on 
the PHI itself? Or is it running on the host processor, and you are trying to 
spawn a process onto the Phi?


On Apr 11, 2015, at 7:55 AM, Andy Riebs 
<andy.ri...@hp.com<mailto:andy.ri...@hp.com>> wrote:

Hi Ralph,

Yes, this is attempting to get OSHMEM to run on the Phi.

I grabbed openmpi-dev-1484-g033418f.tar.bz2 and configured it with

$ ./configure --prefix=/home/ariebs/mic/mpi-nightly    CC=icc -mmic CXX=icpc 
-mmic    \
    --build=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-k1om-linux    \
     AR=x86_64-k1om-linux-ar RANLIB=x86_64-k1om-linux-ranlib  
LD=x86_64-k1om-linux-ld   \
     --enable-mpirun-prefix-by-default --disable-io-romio     
--disable-mpi-fortran    \
     --enable-debug     
--enable-mca-no-build=btl-usnic,btl-openib,common-verbs,oob-ud

(Note that I had to add "oob-ud" to the "--enable-mca-no-build" option, as the 
build complained that mca oob/ud needed mca common-verbs.)

With that configuration, here is what I am seeing now...

$ export SHMEM_SYMMETRIC_HEAP_SIZE=1G
$ shmemrun -H localhost -N 2 --mca sshmem mmap  --mca plm_base_verbose 5 
$PWD/mic.out
[atl1-01-mic0:189895] mca:base:select:(  plm) Querying component [rsh]
[atl1-01-mic0:189895] [[INVALID],INVALID] plm:rsh_lookup on agent ssh : rsh 
path NULL
[atl1-01-mic0:189895] mca:base:select:(  plm) Query of component [rsh] set 
priority to 10
[atl1-01-mic0:189895] mca:base:select:(  plm) Querying component [isolated]
[atl1-01-mic0:189895] mca:base:select:(  plm) Query of component [isolated] set 
priority to 0
[atl1-01-mic0:189895] mca:base:select:(  plm) Querying component [slurm]
[atl1-01-mic0:189895] mca:base:select:(  plm) Skipping component [slurm]. Query 
failed to return a module
[atl1-01-mic0:189895] mca:base:select:(  plm) Selected component [rsh]
[atl1-01-mic0:189895] plm:base:set_hnp_name: initial bias 189895 nodename hash 
4121194178
[atl1-01-mic0:189895] plm:base:set_hnp_name: final jobfam 32419
[atl1-01-mic0:189895] [[32419,0],0] plm:rsh_setup on agent ssh : rsh path NULL
[atl1-01-mic0:189895] [[32419,0],0] plm:base:receive start comm
[atl1-01-mic0:189895] [[32419,0],0] plm:base:setup_job
[atl1-01-mic0:189895] [[32419,0],0] plm:base:setup_vm
[atl1-01-mic0:189895] [[32419,0],0] plm:base:setup_vm creating map
[atl1-01-mic0:189895] [[32419,0],0] setup:vm: working unmanaged allocation
[atl1-01-mic0:189895] [[32419,0],0] using dash_host
[atl1-01-mic0:189895] [[32419,0],0] checking node atl1-01-mic0
[atl1-01-mic0:189895] [[32419,0],0] ignoring myself
[atl1-01-mic0:189895] [[32419,0],0] plm:base:setup_vm only HNP in allocation
[atl1-01-mic0:189895] [[32419,0],0] complete_setup on job [32419,1]
[atl1-01-mic0:189895] [[32419,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Not found in file 
base/plm_base_launch_support.c at line 440
[atl1-01-mic0:189895] [[32419,0],0] plm:base:launch_apps for job [32419,1]
[atl1-01-mic0:189895] [[32419,0],0] plm:base:launch wiring up iof for job 
[32419,1]
[atl1-01-mic0:189895] [[32419,0],0] plm:base:launch [32419,1] registered
[atl1-01-mic0:189895] [[32419,0],0] plm:base:launch job [32419,1] is not a 
dynamic spawn
[atl1-01-mic0:189899] Error: pshmem_init.c:61 - shmem_init() SHMEM failed to 
initialize - aborting
[atl1-01-mic0:189898] Error: pshmem_init.c:61 - shmem_init() SHMEM failed to 
initialize - aborting
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
It looks like SHMEM_INIT failed for some reason; your parallel process is
likely to abort.  There are many reasons that a parallel process can
fail during SHMEM_INIT; some of which are due to configuration or environment
problems.  This failure appears to be an internal failure; here's some
additional information (which may only be relevant to an Open SHMEM
developer):

  mca_memheap_base_select() failed
  --> Returned "Error" (-1) instead of "Success" (0)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHMEM_ABORT was invoked on rank 1 (pid 189899, host=atl1-01-mic0) with 
errorcode -1.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
A SHMEM process is aborting at a time when it cannot guarantee that all
of its peer processes in the job will be killed properly.  You should
double check that everything has shut down cleanly.

Local host: atl1-01-mic0
PID:        189899
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
Primary job  terminated normally, but 1 process returned
a non-zero exit code.. Per user-direction, the job has been aborted.
-------------------------------------------------------
[atl1-01-mic0:189895] [[32419,0],0] plm:base:orted_cmd sending orted_exit 
commands
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
shmemrun detected that one or more processes exited with non-zero status, thus 
causing
the job to be terminated. The first process to do so was:

  Process name: [[32419,1],1]
  Exit code:    255
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
[atl1-01-mic0:189895] 1 more process has sent help message 
help-shmem-runtime.txt / shmem_init:startup:internal-failure
[atl1-01-mic0:189895] Set MCA parameter "orte_base_help_aggregate" to 0 to see 
all help / error messages
[atl1-01-mic0:189895] 1 more process has sent help message help-shmem-api.txt / 
shmem-abort
[atl1-01-mic0:189895] 1 more process has sent help message 
help-shmem-runtime.txt / oshmem shmem abort:cannot guarantee all killed
[atl1-01-mic0:189895] [[32419,0],0] plm:base:receive stop comm




On 04/10/2015 06:37 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
Andy - could you please try the current 1.8.5 nightly tarball and see if it 
helps? The error log indicates that it is failing to get the topology from some 
daemon, I�m assuming the one on the Phi?

You might also add �enable-debug to that configure line and then put -mca 
plm_base_verbose on the shmemrun cmd to get more help


On Apr 10, 2015, at 11:55 AM, Andy Riebs 
<andy.ri...@hp.com<mailto:andy.ri...@hp.com>> wrote:

Summary: MPI jobs work fine, SHMEM jobs work just often enough to be 
tantalizing, on an Intel Xeon Phi/MIC system.

Longer version

Thanks to the excellent write-up last June 
(<https://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2014/06/24711.php><https://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2014/06/24711.php>),
 I have been able to build a version of Open MPI for the Xeon Phi coprocessor 
that runs MPI jobs on the Phi coprocessor with no problem, but not SHMEM jobs.  
Just at the point where I was about to document the problems I was having with 
SHMEM, my trivial SHMEM job worked. And then failed when I tried to run it 
again, immediately afterwards. I have a feeling I may be in uncharted  
territory here.

Environment

  *   RHEL 6.5
  *   Intel Composer XE 2015
  *   Xeon Phi/MIC

----------------


Configuration

$ export PATH=/usr/linux-k1om-4.7/bin/:$PATH
$ source /opt/intel/15.0/composer_xe_2015/bin/compilervars.sh intel64
$ ./configure --prefix=/home/ariebs/mic/mpi \
   CC="icc -mmic" CXX="icpc -mmic" \
   --build=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-k1om-linux \
    AR=x86_64-k1om-linux-ar RANLIB=x86_64-k1om-linux-ranlib \
    LD=x86_64-k1om-linux-ld \
    --enable-mpirun-prefix-by-default --disable-io-romio \
    --disable-vt --disable-mpi-fortran \
    --enable-mca-no-build=btl-usnic,btl-openib,common-verbs
$ make
$ make install

----------------

Test program

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <shmem.h>
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
        int me, num_pe;
        shmem_init();
        num_pe = num_pes();
        me = my_pe();
        printf("Hello World from process %ld of %ld\n", me, num_pe);
        exit(0);
}

----------------

Building the program

export PATH=/home/ariebs/mic/mpi/bin:$PATH
export PATH=/usr/linux-k1om-4.7/bin/:$PATH
source /opt/intel/15.0/composer_xe_2015/bin/compilervars.sh intel64
export 
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/intel/15.0/composer_xe_2015.2.164/compiler/lib/mic:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH

icc -mmic -std=gnu99 -I/home/ariebs/mic/mpi/include -pthread \
        -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/home/ariebs/mic/mpi/lib -Wl,--enable-new-dtags \
        -L/home/ariebs/mic/mpi/lib -loshmem -lmpi -lopen-rte -lopen-pal \
        -lm -ldl -lutil \
        -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/opt/intel/15.0/composer_xe_2015.2.164/compiler/lib/mic \
        -L/opt/intel/15.0/composer_xe_2015.2.164/compiler/lib/mic \
        -o mic.out  shmem_hello.c

----------------

Running the program

(Note that the program had been consistently failing. Then, when I logged back 
into the system to capture the results, it worked once,  and then immediately 
failed when I tried again, as shown below. Logging in and out isn't sufficient 
to correct the problem. Overall, I think I had 3 successful runs in 30-40 
attempts.)

$ shmemrun -H localhost -N 2 --mca sshmem mmap ./mic.out
[atl1-01-mic0:189372] [[30936,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Not found in file 
base/plm_base_launch_support.c at line 426
Hello World from process 0 of 2
Hello World from process 1 of 2
$ shmemrun -H localhost -N 2 --mca sshmem mmap ./mic.out
[atl1-01-mic0:189381] [[30881,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Not found in file 
base/plm_base_launch_support.c at line 426
[atl1-01-mic0:189383] Error: pshmem_init.c:61 - shmem_init() SHMEM failed to 
initialize - aborting
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
It looks like SHMEM_INIT failed for some reason; your parallel process is
likely to abort.  There are many reasons that a parallel process can
fail during SHMEM_INIT; some of which are due to configuration or environment
problems.  This failure appears to be an internal failure; here's some
additional information (which may only be relevant to an Open SHMEM
developer):

  mca_memheap_base_select() failed
  --> Returned "Error" (-1) instead of "Success" (0)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHMEM_ABORT was invoked on rank 0 (pid 189383, host=atl1-01-mic0) with 
errorcode -1.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
A SHMEM process is aborting at a time when it cannot guarantee that all
of its peer processes in the job will be killed properly.  You should
double check that everything has shut down cleanly.

Local host: atl1-01-mic0
PID:        189383
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
Primary job  terminated normally, but 1 process returned
a non-zero exit code.. Per user-direction, the job has been aborted.
-------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
shmemrun detected that one or more processes exited with non-zero status, thus 
causing
the job to be terminated. The first process to do so was:

  Process name: [[30881,1],0]
  Exit code:    255
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Any thoughts about where to go from here?

Andy


--
Andy Riebs
Hewlett-Packard Company
High Performance Computing
+1 404 648 9024
My opinions are not necessarily those of HP


_______________________________________________
users mailing list
us...@open-mpi.org<mailto:us...@open-mpi.org>
Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
Link to this post: 
http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2015/04/26670.php




_______________________________________________
users mailing list
us...@open-mpi.org<mailto:us...@open-mpi.org>
Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
Link to this post: 
http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2015/04/26676.php

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
us...@open-mpi.org<mailto:us...@open-mpi.org>
Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
Link to this post: 
http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2015/04/26678.php




_______________________________________________
users mailing list
us...@open-mpi.org<mailto:us...@open-mpi.org>
Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
Link to this post: 
http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2015/04/26679.php

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
us...@open-mpi.org<mailto:us...@open-mpi.org>
Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
Link to this post: 
http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2015/04/26680.php




_______________________________________________
users mailing list
us...@open-mpi.org<mailto:us...@open-mpi.org>
Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
Link to this post: 
http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2015/04/26682.php

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
us...@open-mpi.org<mailto:us...@open-mpi.org>
Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
Link to this post: 
http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2015/04/26683.php

Reply via email to