BTW, this also works if the source of the traffic is a bare metal server rather 
than a VM.

-Nischal

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 27, 2015, at 10:12 PM, Tomasz Charewicz 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hello,

Have you seen this documentation?

https://techwiki.juniper.net/Documentation/Contrail/Contrail_Controller_Feature_Guide/Configuration/70_Source_Network_Address_Translation_%28SNAT%29<https://techwiki.juniper.net/Documentation/Contrail/Contrail_Controller_Feature_Guide/Configuration/70_Source_Network_Address_Translation_(SNAT)>

BR
TomekC.


Wiadomo?? napisana przez Dan Houtz <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
w dniu 28 lip 2015, o godz. 07:02:


No one else needing such functionality? Maybe we're unique :)

-Dan

Hi everyone,

I imagine the answer to this is currently no, but does Contrail support the 
concept of configuring one to many NAT for a private network? In our deployment 
we will have a number of networks were we don't necessarily need 1:1 static 
mappings of public to private IP addresses offered by the floating IP feature 
but do need hosts on the private network to have outbound Internet access 
(grabbing software, OS packages, etc). In these cases we would use an MS-MIC 
card installed in our MX routers to handle this functionality. Ideally Contrail 
would offer a parameter for a network to enable "Outbound NAT". Has anyone else 
expressed the need for such a feature or has any thought been given to 
something like this?

Thanks!
Dan
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/users_lists.opencontrail.org

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/users_lists.opencontrail.org
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/users_lists.opencontrail.org

Reply via email to