Great! Thank you for the update. In that case I belive the only major issue we are waiting on is supporting external VN with directly configured public prefixes and having the need routing happen between it and inet.0. If there is an ETA on this one it will help us plan accordingly.
Thanks again. You guys rock! -Dan On Aug 23, 2015 2:19 AM, "Suresh Balineni" <[email protected]> wrote: > Dan, > > The issue related to irb's virtual-gateway-address is fixed . > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/juniperopenstack/+bug/1465070 > > - Suresh > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Aug 22, 2015, at 11:28 PM, Dan Houtz <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Nischal, > > It appears that the open bug cases for supporting BMS in external networks > and proper configuration of IRBs using virtual-gateway-address are still > ongoing. Is there any ETA on these? These are two items that are critical > to our roll out of Contrail. > > Thanks! > Dan > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Nischal Sheth <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On Jul 30, 2015, at 5:20 PM, Nischal Sheth <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >> > Hi Dan, >> > >> > The messages below are harmless. They simply mean that the keyspace or >> column >> > already exists, which is expected when DM is restarting. They should >> not be logged >> > as warnings - we will lower the level or remove them altogether. >> > >> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juniperopenstack/+bug/1480011 >> >> -Nischal >> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/users_lists.opencontrail.org
