Hi Laurent,
Am 02.07.2012 um 17:40 schrieb Laurent Blume:
> I've got a simple questions, but it seems there is no simple answer yet, so
> I'd like for some feedback first.
>
> Problem is simple: both the 32- and 64-bit MySQL servers are delivered by
> OpenCSW. How to select one?
>
> This is very much Solaris 10-centric. I really assume here that S9 and below
> are dead or deadish, and not really worth bothering about anymore.
>
> The current method only point to the 32-bit one. There is no mechanism yet to
> select the other one.
>
> Here are the choices I've thought about:
> (1) Get rid of the 32-bit version altogether: seriously, this is my
> preferred way. Solaris 10 supports 32-bit only on x86, and that kind of
> hardware is seriously outdated by now. Replacing it seems trivial;
> Pros: Simple and results in less work
> Cons: Might not be possible, or not useful for all other daemons
>
> (2) Use a central or specific configuration file, user-edited, to get the
> desired value: MySQL5's method already sources a mysql5rc file at different
> locations. It could contains a variable such as
> MYSQL_ARCH=[32|64|amd64|sparcv9|...], that could then be used below to start
> the daemon:
> if [ -n "${MYSQL_ARCH}" -o "${MYSQL_ARCH}" = "32" ]; then
> ${BINDIR}/${MYSQL_ARCH}/mysqld_safe ...
> else
> ${BINDIR}/mysqld_safe ...
> fi
>
> I believe this could be extended easily to any other daemon by sourcing
> /etc/opt/csw/csw.conf, and using, if any, the DAEMONNAME_ARCH variable found
> there (or ${pkgname}_arch?)
> Pros: Easy to select and provide a list of defaults for, either in a
> sample csw,conf file or in daemon-specific rc files, and will be kept easily
> across upgrades; default could easily be set using isainfo -b; it would also
> allow to have different optimization levels, if ever needed;
> Cons: Well, there's the need to create and maintain sample files, and to
> modify existing methods
>
> (3) Use isaexec
> Pros: Transparent, no configuration needed
> Cons: I've been told Dagobert has 1001 reasons not to use it, I guess one
> of them is that when it's actually needed to select a specific version, then
> it's not easy at all
>
> (4) Use an SMF property;
> Pros: It's SMF! It's made with XML! Oracle likes to put everything there!
> Cons: Same as Pros, plus it needs to be handled properly by the CAS stuff
> so it's kept across upgrades.
>
>
> In a pinch, I'd favor (2), since it covers more than just my MySQL problem.
>
> Thoughts?
The downside for (2) is you need to manually select the tools from either
/opt/csw/bin
or /opt/csw/bin/64 for your selected data model. We had this for OpenLDAP at it
is not
easy to understand for users. I tend to believe that completely moving to 64
bit would be
best (with 32 bit libraries available also).
Best regards
-- Dago
--
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to
do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users