>>>>> "CC" == Gian Uberto Lauri <[email protected]> writes:
CC> The web site is not very promising: Stop/Migration: These CC> features have not been implemented for this Transfer Manager, CC> since they depend strongly on the scenario. Limitations confirmed :(. Anyway, I would work with a clustered volume group, that is every node sees the same VG, and that is very close to NFS case where everybody see the same thing. Is it safe then, to assume that tm_mv it's a no op ? I would like avoid using a distributed fs and keep my VMs on a logical volume, and since all nodes share the volume group, migration and stopping should be a no-op... Or am I wrong ? -- ing. Gian Uberto Lauri Ricercatore / Reasearcher Laboratorio Ricerca e Sviluppo / Research & Development Lab. Area Calcolo Distribuito / Distributed Computation Area [email protected] Engineering Ingegneria Informatica spa Corso Stati Uniti 23/C, 35127 Padova (PD) Tel. +39-049.8283.571 | main(){printf(&unix["\021%six\012\0"], Fax +39-049.8283.569 | (unix)["have"]+"fun"-0x60);} Skype: gian.uberto.lauri | David Korn, AT&T Bell Labs http://www.eng.it | ioccc best One Liner, 1987 _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
