[email protected] wrote: > Spent some time in attempts to implement OpenVZ support in > OpenNebula via libvirt I realized that for the moment probably it > was not the most efficient way to do that since libvirt provides > pretty poor OpenVZ support. In particular:
[...] > Taking all mentioned above into account I incline to an opinion it > would be better to implement openvz support in OpenNebula by native > openvz means like vzctl/vzlist/vzcalc/vzmigrate/vzdump commands just > invoking those commands on remote host. > > I would like to know other opinions on that. >From my experiences with libvirt and lxc I would agree that a "native" approach would be better. It seems, that the openstack developers who try to implement OpenVZ support there (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/openvz-driver) came to the same conclusion: "Sadly the openvz support in libvirt is sketchy at best. Network manipulation is very weak. We need a new driver for openvz to afford openvz users full control." Kind regards, Töns -- There is no safe distance. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
