Hi,
I have a long adventure behind me using OpenNebula with a shared OCFS2 storage. In theory - I thought - block-based access should perform much better than NFS. My initial benchmarks supported that line of thinking. Sadly, because of stability and performance issues, I had to switch back to NFS. Here's the long story: http://www.blog.turmair.de/2011/03/ocfs2-vs-nfs-benchmarks-and-the-reality/ My Question is: What are your experiences using clustering filesystems as storage backend? Why did my setup perform so badly - or was that to be expected? Should I try another clustering filesystem (i.e. GFS2), or will it suck just as much? Gruß Stefan Knott _________________________ nbsp GmbH Softwarehaus & IT-Dienstleister Steinweg 56, D-94315 Straubing Tel. +49 9421 7847-275 Fax: +49 9421 7847-150 email: [email protected] http://www.nbsp.de http://www.sitefusion.de http://www.besseres-hosting.de _________________________________________________________ Rechtsform: Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung, Sitz Straubing Registergericht: Straubing HRB 10736, Geschäftsführer: Mario Kandler _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
