>>>>> "TV" == Tino Vazquez <[email protected]> writes:
>> I did some tests using GFS2, with all the nodes in a single >> cluster. I used the NFS driver without any problem. TV> Nice!! If I may ask, with which hypervisor? KVM. As I said elsewere, clusters can become unstable without a fencing device (and possibly without a proper sysadmin), but this is **totally outside** OpenNebula or libvirt responsibility. When you have a good cluster yuo could achieve better performances. OpenNebula team could start thinking about supporting directly an even better solution, the clustered lvm (that's under clustered gfs anyway): Bot front end and nodes see the same clustered volume group through iSCSI/fiberchannel and the frontend governs remotely the mounting/unmounting of the logical volumes during migrations and logical volumes distructions. This does not cover ALL the LVM usages, but for sure covers the most useful configuration for a clustered volume group on a SAN. -- ing. Gian Uberto Lauri Ricercatore / Reasearcher Laboratorio Ricerca e Sviluppo / Research & Development Lab. Area Calcolo Distribuito / Distributed Computation Area [email protected] Engineering Ingegneria Informatica spa Corso Stati Uniti 23/C, 35127 Padova (PD) Tel. +39-049.8283.571 | main(){printf(&unix["\021%six\012\0"], Fax +39-049.8283.569 | (unix)["have"]+"fun"-0x60);} Skype: gian.uberto.lauri | David Korn, AT&T Bell Labs http://www.eng.it | ioccc best One Liner, 1987 _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
