Great! Would that be version 3.4 or 4.0? On Mar 21, 2012 5:29 AM, "Ruben S. Montero" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Yes, you are right. Next version of OpenNebula features multiple datastores. In particular, there is a special one (the system datastore) for storing disk images of running VMs (the /var/lib/one/<vm_id>/images dirs). Among other benefits this allows the use of multiple datastore types (TM if you will), and better plan and keep your storage. We keep the /var/lib/one/<vm_id> for storing deployment files, transfer scripts and the like. You can think of this directory as a kind of /proc fro VMs. > > Thanks for your comments > > Ruben > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:43 AM, Shankhadeep Shome <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> I have been using Open Nebula for a while now and it's getting quite polished however I never really understood the point of creating VM directories right under '/var/lib/one/'. It makes it harder to have different types of storage for running non-persistent storage and persistent images, also it creates a ton of clutter on the '/var/lib/one/' location. Why can't the running VMs get their own mount point like '/var/lib/one/vms' or something? >> >> Shankhadeep >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org >> > > > > -- > Ruben S. Montero, PhD > Project co-Lead and Chief Architect > OpenNebula - The Open Source Solution for Data Center Virtualization > www.OpenNebula.org | [email protected] | @OpenNebula
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
