Hello, actually in OpenNebula 3.4 the TM LVM drivers have been superseeded by the iSCSI drivers. Today we removed the tm_lvm folder from the source, but it's possible that we will bring them back for the final release.
However, the iSCSI drivers are a starting point for integrators to develop their own TM drivers. The iSCSI commands can be nicely substitued with specific SAN commands. Our initial idea is that integrators will hack the iSCSI drivers to fit their san solutions thus eliminating the dependency on CLVM. So I encourage you to take a look at the TM iSCSI drivers and see if it works with some adaption and hacking with your SAN. Cheers, Jaime On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Juanra <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello list. > > We have a fiber channel SAN shared betwen host and we want to use shared LVM > (clvm) without iscsi. > In new beta version there is not any LVM datastore but there isĀ an tm_lvm. > Can we use tm_lvm with fs datastore? > How can I configure shared lvm? > > Thanks in advice > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org > -- Jaime Melis Project Engineer OpenNebula - The Open Source Toolkit for Cloud Computing www.OpenNebula.org | [email protected] _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
