Hi Sean, are the KVM modules loaded in the new machine? you should expect something like:
$ lsmod|grep kvm kvm_intel 125165 0 kvm 361546 1 kvm_intel cheers, Jaime On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Sean Abbott <[email protected]> wrote: > So I have two instances of opennebula running libvirst/kvm. > > They were both installed using identical methods (a bit of a black box, > frankly) on slightly different hardware. > > (one is "nephalem" intel, the other is "westmere". That's the only > difference.) > > in fact, an architecture check from a kernel standpoint seems to come > back identical. (unless my understanding of uname -a is incomplete, > which seems likely) > > Old machine: > Linux my.old.machine.com 2.6.38-7.2.0.2-amd64-8993020 #1 SMP Fri Dec 16 > 23:01:26 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > New machine: > Linux my.new.machine.com 2.6.38-7.2.0.2-amd64-8993020 #1 SMP Fri Dec 16 > 23:01:26 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > However, the capabilities in virsh are very different. The new machine > has i686 instead of x86_64,and it is missing the guest KVM domain type. > > Old capabilities: http://pastebin.com/EptdUYiG > > New capabilities: http://pastebin.com/pke4MGFJ > > Two questions: > > First, any idea why it might've come down differently. > > Second, can it be fixed? Can I try just copying the capabilities from > old to new? Or something equally straightforward? > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org > -- Jaime Melis Project Engineer OpenNebula - The Open Source Toolkit for Cloud Computing www.OpenNebula.org | [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
