Thank you for your replies .
I would be more than welcome to share the ,speed and testing results on
the system,
currently we are testing OpenNebula on smaller system and with software
iSCSI .
One thing we really like is ability to tune system by are need which
very neat and opennebula
just does that , many thanks to developers of OpenNebula.
One think that worries me is Fiber Channel support in OpenNebula I was
looking for some example implementations of FC and OpenNebula but could
not find none in
docs for 3.6 http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel3.6:sm nothint about
FC could be found.
Only thing I could find is 2.0 docs
http://opennebula.org/documentation:archives:rel2.0:features
which say is it supports FC.
Only think I saw is cLVM Jaime Malis and Nicolas Aguis talking about
cLVM in 3.6.
Does driver cLVM work now with multiple hosts sharing Fiber Channel
Storage? Any experience
/ recommendation with FC ?
On 09/20/2012 10:57 AM, Sándor Guba wrote:
I highly recommend to build a prototype for your system. You can test
hypervisors, transfer drivers etc on 2-3 computers. OpenNebula drivers
are written in ruby and bash script that you can customize for your
environment. Count in that OpenNebula developers are very helpfull :).
You have a lot of options to fine tune your system. For example I
changed the image transfer drivers to run on NFS server locally not on
the network wich doubled the clone speed. If you setup that system I
would be glad to hear your experiences and speed statistics :).
2012/9/6 Branko Tanovic <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
Hi,
We are small University located in Belgrade, Serbia ,
our current information system
is created mostly of different hardware manufactures,we use
Citrix Xen Server Free Version primarily for ability to run on
bare metal configuration.
Recently we are in process of buying IBM Blades servers with
StoreWise V7000 and we would like to
switch to OpenNebula Cloud , mainly because we use a lot of open
source technology and
are budget is tight.
This is our configuration
IBM BladeCenter 2 x cpu E5-2640 2x 146GB na 15k, 112GB DDR3
two 8Gbps FC 7 pcs
IBM Storwize V7000 Control Enclosure 16GB cache, 8 x FC ports, 4
iSCSI port, 24
1 pcs
256 GB 2.5-inch SSD HDD 24 pcs
IBM Storwize V7000 expansion enclosure
2 pcs
3TB 3.5 in. 7.2k NL SAS HDD 24 pcs
Most of our vms/ applications use tomcat, mysql ,lamp, alfresco
dms ,SAP , windows 2008 server.
The question is is this configuration good for implementing
OpenNebula solution?
Can Front-End run virtualized on kvm or xen nodes ?
Does nodes access directly to shared storage iSCSI ?
Some remarks,recommendation and experience would be nice.
Thank you Very Very much for the help.
Branko Tanovic
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
