2012/10/15 Carlos Martín Sánchez <[email protected]>: > You can't have 2 different OpenNebula daemons managing the VMs, because all > the data is cached, and that would cause inconsistency issues. > Both of them will try to monitor the VMs and Hosts, and the schedulers will > deploy VMs without any synchronization. > > Is there any reason you need to do that? I always assumed the opennebula > start time is waaaay too low to consider this need.
The proper way to have OpenNebula controller in HA is to create a second OpenNebula frontend, but with no OpenNebula running and ucarp/heartbeat to manage the failover? When master fails, ucarp will start opennebula on the slave host? And for load balancing? _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
