Oh ok I do see reasonable numbers from time to time, I guess its the refresh
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Shankhadeep Shome <[email protected]>wrote: > yea kvm, ubuntu 12.04 for me as well with 3.8.1 but I swear I saw it > before with older versions, I just didn't care enough to post. > > > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Gary S. Cuozzo <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I see this also, using Ubuntu 12.04 with KVM, but if I hit the refresh it >> goes to reasonable numbers. >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Rodolfo Conte Brufatto" <[email protected]> >> *To: *"André Monteiro" <[email protected]> >> *Cc: *"users" <[email protected]> >> *Sent: *Sunday, December 16, 2012 5:37:45 PM >> >> *Subject: *Re: [one-users] Sunstone Bandwidth >> >> Same here, using Ubuntu 12.04 LTS >> >> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 10:16 AM, André Monteiro <[email protected] >> > wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I have this problem also, using KVM with SL6.3. >>> >>> -- >>> André Monteiro >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Ricardo Duarte <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I have this problem too, with KVM and CentOS 6.3, using the default >>>> monitoring intervals. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Ricardo >>>> >>>> > Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:54:59 +0100 >>>> > From: [email protected] >>>> > To: [email protected] >>>> > CC: [email protected] >>>> > Subject: Re: [one-users] Sunstone Bandwidth >>>> >>>> > >>>> > Those values seem pretty high, indeed. What is the hypervisor you are >>>> using? >>>> > >>>> > I've just made a test with kvm. Set the monitoring interval to 30 and >>>> > fired up a download in a vm limited to 10Kb/s. The values are pretty >>>> > similar to the 10Kb/s limit. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Shankhadeep Shome >>>> > <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > > The bandwidth reported in Sunstone cant be right.. I see 15GB/s dl >>>> and >>>> > > 27GB/s upload at th emoment and this is usually the case, sometimes >>>> larger >>>> > > numbers or smaller too. In any case doesn't seem even close to >>>> accurate. >>>> > > Anybody else see this behavior? I'm using the dummy net driver. >>>> > > >>>> > > Shankhadeep >>>> > > >>>> > > _______________________________________________ >>>> > > Users mailing list >>>> > > [email protected] >>>> > > http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > Javier Fontán Muiños >>>> > Project Engineer >>>> > OpenNebula - The Open Source Toolkit for Data Center Virtualization >>>> > www.OpenNebula.org | [email protected] | @OpenNebula >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > Users mailing list >>>> > [email protected] >>>> > http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Users mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Have you tried turning it off and on again? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
