TEMPLATE_NAME is a rather new attribute I think. I don't remind seeing this attribute in 3.8. Perhaps we should delete it to prevent confusion with the template rename feature.
Simon On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Carlos Martín Sánchez < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Now that we have the 'onetemplate rename' operation, we can't rely on > TEMPLATE_NAME to do anything in drivers or upper layer applications. Maybe > we should delete this attribute, and leave only TEMPLATE_ID? > > Regards > > -- > Carlos Martín, MSc > Project Engineer > OpenNebula - The Open-source Solution for Data Center Virtualization > www.OpenNebula.org | [email protected] | > @OpenNebula<http://twitter.com/opennebula><[email protected]> > > > On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Ruben S. Montero < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Indeed, now fixed in one4.0 >> >> THANKS! >> >> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Simon Boulet <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Is it normal that TEMPLATE_NAME is set as a USER TEMPLATE attribute? >> > >> > Shouldn't it be in the regular VM TEMPLATE attribute (just like >> TEMPLATE_ID >> > is)? >> > >> > Simon >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Users mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Ruben S. Montero, PhD >> Project co-Lead and Chief Architect >> OpenNebula - The Open Source Solution for Data Center Virtualization >> www.OpenNebula.org | [email protected] | @OpenNebula >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org >> > >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
