Hi Pedro, can you send us the datastore template?
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Pedro Roger <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Thank you guys for the answers. > I'm using the sunstone interface. I've created the hosts and cluster. > When creating the datastore i chose the LVM preset (Datastore: LVM and > Transfer: LVM) and disk type: BLOCK. > So, i type the volume group name i had created and localhost for storage > server. > But i dont' seem to work, the capacity says -/-. > And i'm not able to create a image on it. It is not shown in the datastore > list when creating the image. > Am i doing the right way? I think i'll wait for OpenNebula 4.4 new lvm > drivers. > > Thanks > > > > > 2013/10/25 Javier Fontan <[email protected]> > >> Hi, >> >> I am contacting the guys that created that drivers to ask them to add >> that code to the github addons repository [1]. I hope that way it is >> easier to share enhancements. >> >> Cheers >> >> [1] http://opennebula.org/software:add-ons >> >> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Jörg Mauer <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > We´re testing a shared storage solution through FC with Opennebula >> > too. Next to the included lvm drivers there is also an implementation >> > that does not seem to require clvm, >> > as the volumes are managed by one node: >> > http://wiki.opennebula.org/shared_lvm >> > (we had to do some modifications to get things working though - still >> > testing) >> > >> > The only disadvantage is that VM snapshots are not possible when you >> > use raw disks instead of qcow2 for kvm. >> > >> > >> > regards, >> > >> > Jörg Mauer >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------- >> > http://www.ign.de >> > >> > Am 24.10.2013 21:07, schrieb Pedro Roger: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> We have four IBM Blade HS22 connected trough Fibre Channel to an >> >> IBM V7000 Storwize, and we are planning to use LVM as a shared >> >> volume group beetwen the hosts, but i can't see an pure LVM driver >> >> in current documentation of OpenNebula, i only see an iSCSI/LVM >> >> implementation. >> >> >> >> Is this configuration good for implementing OpenNebula, or i must >> >> go to use the iSCSI ports? Or yet someone can sugest an best >> >> implementation using the V7000 though Fibre Channel? >> >> >> >> Thanks in advance >> >> >> >> -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Pedro Roger >> >> Magalhães Vasconcelos http://www.proger.eti.br >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ Users mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Users mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org >> >> >> >> -- >> Javier Fontán Muiños >> Developer >> OpenNebula - The Open Source Toolkit for Data Center Virtualization >> www.OpenNebula.org | @OpenNebula | github.com/jfontan >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org >> > > > > -- > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > Pedro Roger Magalhães Vasconcelos > http://www.proger.eti.br > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org > > -- Jaime Melis Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
