noatime, nodiratime - might save some bandwidth -----Original Message----- From: Users [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of ML mail Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 11:07 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [one-users] NFS hard or soft mount for datastores?
Thanks for your input! I will change my NFS mounts for hard instead of soft, as currently I have the following: nfsserver:/data/01/one/datastores/100 /var/lib/one/datastores/100 nfs soft,intr,rsize=8192,wsize=8192 any other options you might recommend or adapt? On Wednesday, June 18, 2014 10:39 AM, Stefan Kooman <[email protected]> wrote: Quoting ML mail ([email protected]): > Hello, > > I am using a Linux NFS server to store and run my VM images and would > like to know what type of NFS mount does OpenNebula recommend for > mounting the datastore NFS shares on my ONE hosts. Would you rather > recommend hard or soft NFS mount options? If you care about your data, never ever use soft mounts. You risk corrupting all your vm images if something goes wrong with your nfs server and/or network connecting all of it. Gr. Stefan -- | BIT BV http://www.bit.nl/ Kamer van Koophandel 09090351 | GPG: 0xD14839C6 +31 318 648 688 / [email protected] _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ________________________________ This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you for understanding. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
