Hi Jaime, Javier

Do you think that it would be possible to include these ceph patches into next 4.8 release? At this moment we are applying theses patches by hand in our configuration to use different Ceph pools.

https://github.com/OpenNebula/one/pull/27
https://github.com/OpenNebula/one/pull/28
https://github.com/OpenNebula/one/pull/29
https://github.com/OpenNebula/one/pull/30
https://github.com/OpenNebula/one/pull/31

Cheers
Alvaro

On 17/07/14 14:11, Alvaro Simon Garcia wrote:
Hi Jaime

Sorry for the late reply, I didn't see your mail before because I was included in cc. With this patch you don't need to include a new user into your ceph keyring. If you want to use a ceph datastore you only need to include the user and pool into the datastore template that's all. In our case we use livbirt datastore and we have created two ceph datastore for testing porposes (each one use a different pool as well):


$ onedatastore show ceph
DATASTORE 103 INFORMATION
ID             : 103
NAME           : ceph
USER           : oneadmin
GROUP          : oneadmin
CLUSTER        : -
TYPE           : IMAGE
DS_MAD         : ceph
TM_MAD         : ceph
BASE PATH      : /var/lib/one//datastores/103
DISK_TYPE      : RBD

DATASTORE CAPACITY
TOTAL:         : 87.6T
FREE:          : 59.2T
USED:          : 28.4T
LIMIT:         : -

PERMISSIONS
OWNER          : um-
GROUP          : u--
OTHER          : ---

DATASTORE TEMPLATE
BASE_PATH="/var/lib/one//datastores/"
BRIDGE_LIST="hyp004.cubone.os"
CEPH_HOST="ceph001.cubone.os ceph002.cubone.os ceph003.cubone.os"
CEPH_SECRET="xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
CEPH_USER="libvirt"
CLONE_TARGET="SELF"
DATASTORE_CAPACITY_CHECK="yes"
DISK_TYPE="RBD"
DS_MAD="ceph"
LN_TARGET="NONE"
POOL_NAME="one"
TM_MAD="ceph"

IMAGES
7
8
31
32
34
35


and the second one:

$ onedatastore show "ceph two"
DATASTORE 104 INFORMATION
ID             : 104
NAME           : ceph two
USER           : oneadmin
GROUP          : oneadmin
CLUSTER        : -
TYPE           : IMAGE
DS_MAD         : ceph
TM_MAD         : ceph
BASE PATH      : /var/lib/one//datastores/104
DISK_TYPE      : RBD

DATASTORE CAPACITY
TOTAL:         : 87.6T
FREE:          : 59.2T
USED:          : 28.4T
LIMIT:         : -

PERMISSIONS
OWNER          : um-
GROUP          : u--
OTHER          : ---

DATASTORE TEMPLATE
BASE_PATH="/var/lib/one//datastores/"
BRIDGE_LIST="hyp004.cubone.os"
CEPH_HOST="ceph001.cubone.os ceph002.cubone.os ceph003.cubone.os"
CEPH_SECRET="xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
CEPH_USER="libvirt"
CLONE_TARGET="SELF"
DATASTORE_CAPACITY_CHECK="yes"
DISK_TYPE="RBD"
DS_MAD="ceph"
LN_TARGET="NONE"
POOL_NAME="two"
TM_MAD="ceph"

As you can see we are using different pools in each one (so we don't need to include the pool name into ceph.conf either, and we are able to use several ceph clusters) and this change simplifies the ONE conf and ceph cluster admin as well.

Cheers
Alvaro

On 03/07/14 17:08, Jaime Melis wrote:
Hi Alvaro,

thanks a lot for the contribution. I haven't tested it yet, but the code seems to be perfect.

My main issue here is that I'm not entirely sure if we need this. Doesn't it make sense for the oneadmin user to be in the keyring and be able to run rados? You mentioned this, but I'm having some trouble understanding what do you mean:

> This feature could be useful as well if you want to monitor several datastores that are using different ceph pools and users ids. > You only have to include the id and pool info into the ONE datastore template and the monitoring script will use one or another depending on the DS conf.

With the current system you can monitor multiple ceph pools as long as the oneadmin user has right, isn't that so?

Joel, would you like to weigh in? would you find this useful?

cheers,
Jaime


On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Javier Fontan <jfon...@opennebula.org <mailto:jfon...@opennebula.org>> wrote:

    Great, thanks! Our ceph dev is traveling right now, he will
    review the
    patches when he arrives.

    Cheers

    On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Alvaro Simon Garcia
    <alvaro.simongar...@ugent.be
    <mailto:alvaro.simongar...@ugent.be>> wrote:
    > Hi Javier
    >
    > We have modified the ceph monitor to take into account the
    datastore ceph
    > pool and also the ceph user. This is a generic solution that
    could be useful
    > for other datacenters as well, we have created a pull request
    in github if
    > you are agree about this change and you want to include it in
    the next
    > release.
    >
    > https://github.com/OpenNebula/one/pull/27
    >
    > We only have modified these lines in
    > /var/lib/one/remotes/datastore/ceph/monitor:
    >
    >> --- monitor.orig.190614    2014-06-19 14:35:24.022755989 +0200
    >> +++ monitor    2014-06-19 14:49:34.043187892 +0200
    >> @@ -46,10 +46,12 @@
    >>  while IFS= read -r -d '' element; do
    >>      XPATH_ELEMENTS[i++]="$element"
    >>  done < <($XPATH
    /DS_DRIVER_ACTION_DATA/DATASTORE/TEMPLATE/BRIDGE_LIST \
    >> - /DS_DRIVER_ACTION_DATA/DATASTORE/TEMPLATE/POOL_NAME)
    >> + /DS_DRIVER_ACTION_DATA/DATASTORE/TEMPLATE/POOL_NAME \
    >> + /DS_DRIVER_ACTION_DATA/DATASTORE/TEMPLATE/CEPH_USER)
    >>
    >>  BRIDGE_LIST="${XPATH_ELEMENTS[j++]}"
    >>  POOL_NAME="${XPATH_ELEMENTS[j++]:-$POOL_NAME}"
    >> +CEPH_USER="${XPATH_ELEMENTS[j++]}"
    >>
    >>  HOST=`get_destination_host`
    >>
    >> @@ -61,7 +63,7 @@
    >>  # ------------ Compute datastore usage -------------
    >>
    >>  MONITOR_SCRIPT=$(cat <<EOF
    >> -$RADOS df | $AWK '{
    >> +$RADOS df -p ${POOL_NAME} --id ${CEPH_USER}| $AWK '{
    >>      if (\$1 == "total") {
    >>
    >>          space = int(\$3/1024)
    >
    >
    > CEPH_USER and POOL_NAME should be mandatory to create the ceph
    datastore.
    >
    > Cheers
    > Alvaro
    >
    >
    >
    >> Hola Javi
    >>
    >> Thanks a lot for your feedback. Yes we will modify the current
    >> monitoring scripts to take into account this. This feature
    could be
    >> useful as well if you want to monitor several datastores that
    are using
    >> different ceph pools and users ids. You only have to include
    the id and
    >> pool info into the ONE datastore template and the monitoring
    script will
    >> use one or another depending on the DS conf.
    >>
    >>
    >> Cheers and thanks!
    >> Alvaro
    >> On 2014-06-17 14:55, Javier Fontan wrote:
    >>>
    >>> CEPH_USER is used when generating the libvirt/kvm deployment
    file but
    >>> not for DS monitoring:
    >>>
    >>> * Deployment file generation:
    >>>
    >>>
    
https://github.com/OpenNebula/one/blob/one-4.6/src/vmm/LibVirtDriverKVM.cc#L461
    >>> * Monitoring:
    >>>
    
https://github.com/OpenNebula/one/blob/one-4.6/src/datastore_mad/remotes/ceph/monitor#L64
    >>>
    >>> Ceph is not may area of expertise but you may need to add those
    >>> parameters to the monitor script a maybe to other scripts
    that use the
    >>> "rados" command. It may also be possible to modify the RADOS
    command
    >>> to have those parameters instead of modifying all the scripts:
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    
https://github.com/OpenNebula/one/blob/one-4.6/src/mad/sh/scripts_common.sh#L40
    >>>
    >>> As I said I don't know much about Ceph and it may be those
    credentials
    >>> could be set in a config file or so.
    >>>
    >>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Alvaro Simon Garcia
    >>> <alvaro.simongar...@ugent.be
    <mailto:alvaro.simongar...@ugent.be>> wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>> Hi
    >>>>
    >>>> We have included the admin keyring instead of libvirt user
    and it
    >>>> works...
    >>>> that means that we can run rbd or qemu-img wihtout the
    libvirt id, but
    >>>> is
    >>>> not the best solution. We have included the user into
    datastore conf:
    >>>>
    >>>> CEPH_USER="libvirt"
    >>>>
    >>>> but it seems that is not used by opennebula at the end
    >>>>
    >>>> Cheers
    >>>> Alvaro
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> On 2014-06-17 10:09, Alvaro Simon Garcia wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Hi all
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> We have included our ONE nodes into Ceph cluster, cephx
    auth is working
    >>>>> but OpenNebula is not able to detect the free space:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> $ onedatastore show 103
    >>>>>> DATASTORE 103 INFORMATION
    >>>>>> ID             : 103
    >>>>>> NAME           : ceph
    >>>>>> USER           : oneadmin
    >>>>>> GROUP          : oneadmin
    >>>>>> CLUSTER        : -
    >>>>>> TYPE           : IMAGE
    >>>>>> DS_MAD         : ceph
    >>>>>> TM_MAD         : ceph
    >>>>>> BASE PATH      : /var/lib/one//datastores/103
    >>>>>> DISK_TYPE      : RBD
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> DATASTORE CAPACITY
    >>>>>> TOTAL:         : 0M
    >>>>>> FREE:          : 0M
    >>>>>> USED:          : 0M
    >>>>>> LIMIT:         : -
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> PERMISSIONS
    >>>>>> OWNER          : um-
    >>>>>> GROUP          : u--
    >>>>>> OTHER          : ---
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> $ onedatastore list
    >>>>>>      ID NAME  SIZE AVAIL CLUSTER      IMAGES TYPE DS
    >>>>>> TM
    >>>>>>       0 system  114.8G 85%   -                 0 sys -
    >>>>>> shared
    >>>>>>       1 default 114.9G 84%   -                 2 img fs
    >>>>>> ssh
    >>>>>>       2 files 114.9G 84%   -                 0 fil fs
    >>>>>> ssh
    >>>>>>     103 ceph  0M -     -                 0 img ceph
    >>>>>> ceph
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> but if we run rados as oneadmin user:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> $  rados df -p one --id libvirt
    >>>>>> pool name       category             KB      objects clones
    >>>>>> degraded      unfound   rd        rd KB           wr        wr
    >>>>>> KB
    >>>>>> one             -              0 0            0
    >>>>>> 0           0            0 0            0            0
    >>>>>>      total used 1581852           37
    >>>>>>      total avail 140846865180
    >>>>>>      total space 140848447032
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> It's working correctly (we are using one pool and libvirt
    ceph id)
    >>>>>
    >>>>> the oned.log only shows this info:
    >>>>> Tue Jun 17 10:06:37 2014 [InM][D]: Monitoring datastore
    default (1)
    >>>>> Tue Jun 17 10:06:37 2014 [InM][D]: Monitoring datastore
    files (2)
    >>>>> Tue Jun 17 10:06:37 2014 [InM][D]: Monitoring datastore
    ceph (103)
    >>>>> Tue Jun 17 10:06:37 2014 [ImM][D]: Datastore default (1)
    successfully
    >>>>> monitored.
    >>>>> Tue Jun 17 10:06:37 2014 [ImM][D]: Datastore files (2)
    successfully
    >>>>> monitored.
    >>>>> Tue Jun 17 10:06:37 2014 [ImM][D]: Datastore ceph (103)
    successfully
    >>>>> monitored.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Any clue about how to debug this issue?
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Thanks in advance!
    >>>>> Alvaro
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> _______________________________________________
    >>>>> Users mailing list
    >>>>> Users@lists.opennebula.org <mailto:Users@lists.opennebula.org>
    >>>>> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
    >>>>
    >>>> _______________________________________________
    >>>> Users mailing list
    >>>> Users@lists.opennebula.org <mailto:Users@lists.opennebula.org>
    >>>> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
    >>>
    >>>
    >> _______________________________________________
    >> Users mailing list
    >> Users@lists.opennebula.org <mailto:Users@lists.opennebula.org>
    >> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
    >
    >



    --
    Javier Fontán Muiños
    Developer
    OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
    www.OpenNebula.org <http://www.OpenNebula.org> | @OpenNebula |
    github.com/jfontan <http://github.com/jfontan>
    _______________________________________________
    Users mailing list
    Users@lists.opennebula.org <mailto:Users@lists.opennebula.org>
    http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org




--
Jaime Melis
Project Engineer
OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
www.OpenNebula.org <http://www.OpenNebula.org> | jme...@opennebula.org <mailto:jme...@opennebula.org>


_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Reply via email to