I agree with you on both parts, I was just stating what I noticed on both.
As per the former, it is built on 4.8 (explicitly listed as "Revision 4.8"
"one-context.rpm")
http://dev.opennebula.org/projects/opennebula/files
http://dev.opennebula.org/attachments/download/804/one-context_4.8.0.rpm
http://dev.opennebula.org/attachments/download/806/one-context_4.8.0.deb
That's where I found them.
On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 17:43:33 -0700, Bill Cole
<openneb-users-20120...@billmail.scconsult.com> wrote:
On 25 Aug 2014, at 19:40, Damon (Albino Geek) wrote:
Hello,
I found that there is actually a prebuilt 4.8 context RPM in one of
their source trees (not GitHub).
That's not exactly helpful. The fact that there's an RPM in some unnamed
place built from who-knows-what revision is an interesting and maybe
indicative factoid, but it does not clarify whether or not there will be
a canonical RPM for the package in the same repository as those for the
other packages (or anywhere documented.)
As per the repo change, this new version actually makes more sense and
follows proper repo format.
http://mirrors.kernel.org/centos/6/os/x86_64/ being an example
repository that follows standard format.
The "stable" path part didn't make any sense considering how versions
work in OpenNebula.
The '4.8' part doesn't make any sense in any context, and *changing* the
baseurl for the repository with each release does away with a key reason
for using a package repository.
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
