-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi to all.
As Esteban say, we have a planned updated to last stable opennebula release the Wednesday 18th, but i think we can wait if the libxmlrpc-c is updated in the next days or maybe weeks. I think we can wait because the new ON not have critical changes (we have pached one-flow yet) and make 2 updates in the same month can be a problem for our costumers... (we use oneflow in a lot of critical services and is a problem make 2 scheduled stops) But if the change is programated to 4.12 we going to update and patch it (I think Ruben have a special love story paching software hehe) Again, a lot of thanks. El 12/02/15 a las 19:32, Esteban Freire escribió: > Hi Carlos, > > Thank you very much for checking it :) > > About if it should be fixed in 1.33.14, I hope Rubén answer to this > tomorrow since it is the one looking at this issue. > > When do you think we could test this? Sorry for the question/hurry but > we are failing accounting due to this issue in FedCloud (EGI). In > principle, we are going to update to last ON version next Wednesday 18th. > > Thanks in advance, > Esteban > > On 02/12/2015 07:23 PM, Carlos Martín Sánchez wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm not directly involved in the packaging, but as far as I can tell, >> OpenNebula 4.8 comes with libxmlrpc-c version 1.33.6. >> If I understand correctly, the problem you report should be fixed in >> 1.33.14? >> >> I've checked and the current super stable version is 1.33.16 . We >> will see if the static library can be updated without breaking >> anything . >> >> Regards. >> >>  http://xmlrpc-c.sourceforge.net/change_super_stable.html >>  http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/3594 >> >> -- >> Carlos Martín, MSc >> Project Engineer >> OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple >> www.OpenNebula.org <http://www.OpenNebula.org> | >> cmar...@opennebula.org <mailto:cmar...@opennebula.org> | @OpenNebula >> <http://twitter.com/opennebula> >> >> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 12:08 PM, RubEn DIez LAzaro <rd...@cesga.es >> <mailto:rd...@cesga.es>> wrote: >> >> HI: >> >> The distro is Scientific Linux release 6.4 (Carbon) and ONE is >> installed from repo (it seems be the repo for CentOS 6) >> >> [root@cloud yum.repos.d]# cat opennebula.repo >> [opennebula] >> name=opennebula >> baseurl=http://downloads.opennebula.org/repo/4.8/CentOS/6/x86_64 >> enabled=1 >> gpgcheck=0 >> >> >> The installed (from standard repos) version of libxmlrpc-c is >> 1.16.24: >> >> # yum info xmlrpc-c >> [.....] >> Installed Packages >> Name : xmlrpc-c >> Arch : x86_64 >> Version : 1.16.24 >> Release : 1209.1840.el6 >> Size : 263 k >> Repo : installed >> From repo : sl >> Summary : A lightweight RPC library based on XML and HTTP >> URL : http://xmlrpc-c.sourceforge.net/ >> License : BSD and MIT >> Description : XML-RPC is a quick-and-easy way to make procedure >> calls over the >> : Internet. It converts the procedure call into XML >> document, sends >> : it to a remote server using HTTP, and gets back the >> response as >> : XML. >> : >> : This library provides a modular implementation of >> XML-RPC for C. >> >> but this is no matter since you claims that ONE is statically >> linked.... What version of xmlrpc-c is linked to the ONE from the >> showed repo?? >> >> We get a source path for 1.33.14 and we build a possible (yet >> untested, done by hand using patch we have for 1.33.14) patch for >> 1.16.24.... Perhaps we can send you these patches for fix the >> issue in your statically linked xmlrpc-c??? >> >> Regards. >> >> >> >> >> On 12/02/15 11:48, Carlos Martín Sánchez wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> We already use a statically linked libxmlrpc-c version to use a >>> newer one for some distros. >>> How did you install ONE, what packages are you using? Which version? >>> >>> Also, can you please share more about the libxmlrpc-c versions >>> that cause problems, and when it was fixed? >>> >>> Regards >>> -- >>> Carlos Martín, MSc >>> Project Engineer >>> OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple >>> www.OpenNebula.org <http://www.OpenNebula.org> | >>> cmar...@opennebula.org <mailto:cmar...@opennebula.org> | >>> @OpenNebula <http://twitter.com/opennebula> >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Esteban Freire >>> <esfre...@cesga.es <mailto:esfre...@cesga.es>> wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> We are having an issue with oneacct command when we try to >>> get the accounting for a group, for example: >>> >>> [oneadmin@cloud ~]$ oneacct -g ops >>> ops >>> HTTP-Error: 500 Internal Server Error >>> >>> [oneadmin@cloud ~]$ oneacct -g fedcloud.egi.eu >>> <http://fedcloud.egi.eu> >>> fedcloud.egi.eu <http://fedcloud.egi.eu> >>> HTTP-Error: 500 Internal Server Error >>> >>> As far as we have been told, it seems the issue it is hidden >>> deep in libxmlrpc and has almost nothing to do with >>> OpenNebula or its version. The problem is this (briefly): >>> >>> Once the VM history goes over approx. 40k of VMs, libxmlrpc >>> will refuse to allocate enough memory for some OpenNebula >>> responses to RPC commands. >>> >>> Also, the solution proposed is to compile OpenNebula against >>> a newer and patched version of libxmlrpc but to be honest, I >>> would prefer avoid this solution. >>> >>> I understand this is not an OpenNebula issue but I wonder if >>> as OpenNebula developers you have seen this issue before and >>> it there is any other better solution. Also, if some other >>> site has experiment this issue, I would like to know which >>> was the solution applied. >>> >>> Any help is welcome on this since we need to solve this issue >>> asap :) >>> >>> Thanks in advance, >>> Esteban >>> >>> -- ++-------------------------++ >>> Esteban Freire García >>> Centro de supercomputación de Galicia >>> Avda. de Vigo s/n. Campus Vida >>> 15705 - Santiago de Compostela. Spain >>> Tlfn.: 981 56 98 10 Extension:274 >>> Fax: 981 59 46 16 >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list >>> Users@lists.opennebula.org <mailto:Users@lists.opennebula.org> >>> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list >>> Users@lists.opennebula.org <mailto:Users@lists.opennebula.org> >>> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> Users@lists.opennebula.org <mailto:Users@lists.opennebula.org> >> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> Users@lists.opennebula.org >> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.opennebula.org > http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org > - -- Alejandro Feijóo Fraga Systems Technician CESGA -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJU3SDrAAoJEKshAoM6XWq54GwIAKY4yp/4+REWqjSKBCZoHInj RGmKvUFuGbo7pfV7Ttreztxu3wF1KidIAR0uMG0/zoJ3DR/q/c4hdWaIIhw3PAv8 x/rBBWNYRgCOX520AmOA7AYaKMnvsRWsf4yQST2Q9Biij3dkaBvU7+IKpCcw6oeR L3Athpe15Jnl+k5oLw926ntrN0Ol+A3SBoWM4Ndn8+XCdEbEpi2BqrgcX0Ex5L0z L9e9Cl+pzl9wRVBNxiy3Fd/zPcFQI3MXvfyYmcceRbwEfgxO+o79e2ZcXmmLeXfc 9zhzHiSgjf1TlqrdHvDv7TT0cFIYXyiJRE3RDGhAwbBq8MwAmbAUc0mbQ7Bamg4= =WENu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org