Hi all, Can any one tell me if the same running instance of Openser can be configured as a stateful proxy for some user accounts and for some numbers like emergency services, it acts like a stateless proxy, just forwarding the request to the destination?
Thanks, Padmaja ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 10:36 AM Subject: Users Digest, Vol 30, Issue 7 > Send Users mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. proper call tear down (Miles Scruggs) > 2. gateway aspect of LCR module (Miles Scruggs) > 3. Re: gateway aspect of LCR module (Ovidiu Sas) > 4. Re: MediaProxy 1.9.0 - Radius (Jeremy McNamara) > 5. Reg. conditional processing of invite (Padmaja) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 14:11:56 -0700 > From: Miles Scruggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [OpenSER-Users] proper call tear down > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes > > Hi, > > This is probably more SIP related than openSER, but I'll ask it here > anyway > > When we were at VON I brought up the subject of accounting and > verifying proper call tear down, and it seems the ideal solution from > a sip perspective is RFC 4028 (SIP session timers) which tracks the > actual sip session with the UA. What I'm starting to realize is that > support for this is very limited and I haven't found much evidence if > any in the devices where network failures are most likely to occur > ATAs and end user devices. > > This seems to leave me relying on the media stream, but this also has > its issues with network issues occurring when calls are placed on > hold. Does anyone have any good suggestions for accurate accounting > when dealing with end users, or is what I described as good as I'm > going to get, until I find some solutions that support 4028? > > Cheers > > Miles Scruggs > Wide Ideas | Operations | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 509.525.6522 > ext 4880 > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 14:15:30 -0700 > From: Miles Scruggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [OpenSER-Users] gateway aspect of LCR module > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes > > Hi guys, > > Great to meet many of you this week at VON and looking forward to > getting together again soon. > > We have a question about the gateway aspect which is part of the LCR > module. We are needing to route to various carriers which the module > handles great, but we are trying to figure out if there is an elegant > way to handle the situation where a carrier provides us with multiple > proxies. For instance if carrier A provides proxy1 and proxy2, > carrier B etc.... When we get the AVP back which will be our stack to > do serial forking the sequence is dependent on the proxy response (or > lack of response) > > For instance if we get a 400 error back from either proxy there isn't > much use in trying the other proxy we need to more along to a > completely different carrier. For 500 errors or time outs will > continue on using the same carrier. The obvious ways to do this: to > abandon the gateway aspect all together and just build logic which we > could use to process what would appear to be a multi demential array > instead of single diminutional array. I'm just writing to see if > there is a nice out of the box way to handle this scenario, also if > not, is this something which developers would be interested in having > added to the module? > > Cheers > > Miles Scruggs > Wide Ideas | Operations | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 509.525.6522 > ext 4880 > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 19:33:44 -0400 > From: "Ovidiu Sas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] gateway aspect of LCR module > To: "Miles Scruggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [email protected] > Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Hi Miles, > > It was nice meeting you at VoN. > > With respect to your question, there are a few options. > First option would be to mess with the avp. As soon as you get a reply > back that should discard the entire gateway group, remove all the > remaining gateway (belonging to that particular group) from the avp > before calling next_gw(). > The second option would be to create a new function: next_gw_group(). > > This is just the top of my head (so there might be some details that > needs to be worked out). > > > On the other hand, there is a new module called carrierroute: > http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.3.x/carrierroute.html > Check this module out. It may provide some extra flexibility. > > > Regards, > Ovidiu Sas > > On 11/2/07, Miles Scruggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> Great to meet many of you this week at VON and looking forward to >> getting together again soon. >> >> We have a question about the gateway aspect which is part of the LCR >> module. We are needing to route to various carriers which the module >> handles great, but we are trying to figure out if there is an elegant >> way to handle the situation where a carrier provides us with multiple >> proxies. For instance if carrier A provides proxy1 and proxy2, >> carrier B etc.... When we get the AVP back which will be our stack to >> do serial forking the sequence is dependent on the proxy response (or >> lack of response) >> >> For instance if we get a 400 error back from either proxy there isn't >> much use in trying the other proxy we need to more along to a >> completely different carrier. For 500 errors or time outs will >> continue on using the same carrier. The obvious ways to do this: to >> abandon the gateway aspect all together and just build logic which we >> could use to process what would appear to be a multi demential array >> instead of single diminutional array. I'm just writing to see if >> there is a nice out of the box way to handle this scenario, also if >> not, is this something which developers would be interested in having >> added to the module? >> >> Cheers >> >> Miles Scruggs >> Wide Ideas | Operations | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 509.525.6522 >> ext 4880 >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 22:08:06 -0400 > From: Jeremy McNamara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] MediaProxy 1.9.0 - Radius > To: Brian Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Brian Heath wrote: >> If you've stopped using MediaProxy, what do you use now? I'm >> currently >> seeking an alternative to MediaProxy, and would appreciate some ideas. >> All >> I need is NAT traversal - but something does doesn't route media (voice) >> through the OpenSER server... >> > > > > As I suggested to Mike, use Asterisk. You get full transcoding > support, proper call accounting and the ability to do calling > applications (ivr, etc) , if you want. > > > > You can fix the NAT problems in the SDP from within openser.cfg. > > > > > Jeremy > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 10:37:52 +0530 > From: "Padmaja" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [OpenSER-Users] Reg. conditional processing of invite > To: <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; > reply-type=original > > Hi all, > > I have an issue, where the sip user dials 911 number and hangs up. The 911 > operator then calls back to the user using the call back command provided > earlier say 8911 (there is a b2bua that interprets the call back number > and > routes the call to the specific user). This number is to be routed via the > openser proxy to the b2bua. However, when the 911 calls back, proxy treats > this number as a username and since there are no registrations to this > 8911 > number (though this entry is present at the proxy, no device has > registered > with this number), it sends back "404 Not found". How can this be > circumvented? > > Thanks, > Padmaja > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 3:46 AM > Subject: Users Digest, Vol 30, Issue 6 > > >> Send Users mailing list submissions to >> [email protected] >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of Users digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Core dumped when deploying presence module (Sergio Gutierrez) >> 2. Re: MediaProxy 1.9.0 - Radius (Brian Heath) >> 3. Re: Forking Madness (Chris Heiser) >> 4. Re: MediaProxy 1.9.0 - Radius (Mike O'Connor) >> 5. Re: MediaProxy 1.9.0 - Radius (Ovidiu Sas) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 15:59:56 -0500 >> From: "Sergio Gutierrez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: [OpenSER-Users] Core dumped when deploying presence module >> To: [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Message-ID: >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" >> >> Hello to all members. >> >> Currently we are trying to deploy presence module in the following >> environment: >> >> 1. Openser 1.2.1 >> 2. Solaris 10 on Sparc System >> 3. libxml 2.6.30 >> >> Openser starts up fine, but when happens any event as a Status change of >> a >> user agent, Openser crashes. >> Below I send an extract from the logfile, and the backtrace of the core. >> Thanks in advance for your attention. >> >> Sergio Guti?rrez >> EPM Telecomunicaciones >> Medellin - Colombia >> >> **************************************************** >>>From Openser logfile. >> >> 0(5493) Nuevo Requerimiento - M=SUBSCRIBE >> RURI=sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] T=sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> IP=200.116.28.88ID=YmE2MGVhMGQzMTI3ZmU0YTkzMDJjNjIxODNmMGIwOWE. >> 0(5493) comp_scriptvar: str 20 : 5192901 >> 0(5493) DEBUG:maxfwd:is_maxfwd_present: value = 70 >> 0(5493) parse_headers: flags=ffffffffffffffff >> 0(5493) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <1> <SUBSCRIBE> >> 0(5493) DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0 >> 0(5493) found end of header >> 0(5493) PRESENCE: handle_subscribe: 'expires' found >> 0(5493) PRESENCE: handle_subscribe: lexpire= 3600 >> 0(5493) PRESENCE: handle_subscribe: 'To' header ALREADY PARSED: < >> sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> 0(5493) PRESENCE:handle_subscribe: generating to_tag >> 0(5493) >> [p_user]= 5192901 [p_domain]= 200.13.225.250 >> [w_user]= 5192902 [w_domain]= 200.13.225.250 >> 0(5493) [event]= presence >> [staus]= pending >> [expires]= 3600 >> 0(5493) [to_tag]= 10.5493.1194034490.40 >> [from_tag]= 1f783845 >> 0(5493) PRESENCE: update_subscription ... >> 0(5493) >> [p_user]= 5192901 [p_domain]= 200.13.225.250 >> [w_user]= 5192902 [w_domain]= 200.13.225.250 >> 0(5493) [event]= presence >> [staus]= pending >> [expires]= 3600 >> 0(5493) [to_tag]= 10.5493.1194034490.40 >> [from_tag]= 1f783845 >> 0(5493) expires: 3600 >> 0(5493) PRESENCE:update_subscription:Inserting into database: >> n_query_cols:14 >> 0(5493) [0] = to_user 5192901 >> 0(5493) [1] = to_domain 200.13.225.250 >> 0(5493) [2] = from_user 5192902 >> 0(5493) [3] = from_domain 200.13.225.250 >> 0(5493) [4] = event presence >> 0(5493) [5] = event_id >> 0(5493) [6] = callid YmE2MGVhMGQzMTI3ZmU0YTkzMDJjNjIxODNmMGIwOWE. >> 0(5493) [7] = to_tag 10.5493.1194034490.40 >> 0(5493) [8] = from_tag 1f783845 >> 0(5493) [9] = contact sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:47166 >> 0(5493) [10] = status pending >> 0(5493) [11] = cseq 1 >> 0(5493) [12] = expires 1194038090 >> 0(5493) [13] = version 0 >> 0(5493) parse_headers: flags=ffffffffffffffff >> 0(5493) check_via_address(200.116.28.88, 192.168.0.13, 0) >> 0(5493) DBG:sl:run_sl_callbacks: callback id 0 entered >> 0(5493) trace_sl_onreply_out: trace off... >> 0(5493) PRESENCE: get_subs_dialog:n= 1 >> 0(5493) PRESENCE:notify:dialog informations: >> 0(5493) >> [p_user]= 5192901 [p_domain]= 200.13.225.250 >> [w_user]= 5192901 [w_domain]= 200.13.225.250 >> 0(5493) [event]= presence.winfo >> [staus]= active >> [expires]= 3518 >> 0(5493) [to_tag]= 10.5493.1194034408.34 >> [from_tag]= 39320458 >> 0(5493) presence:uandd_to_uri: uri=sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> 0(5493) presence:uandd_to_uri: uri=sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> 0(5493) presence:uandd_to_uri: uri=sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> 0(5493) PRESENCE: notify: build notify to user= 5192901 domain= >> 200.13.225.250 for event= presence.winfo >> 0(5493) >> [p_user]= 5192901 [p_domain]= 200.13.225.250 >> [w_user]= 5192901 [w_domain]= 200.13.225.250 >> 0(5493) [event]= presence.winfo >> [staus]= active >> [expires]= 3518 >> 0(5493) [to_tag]= 10.5493.1194034408.34 >> [from_tag]= 39320458 >> 0(5493) PRESENCE:build_str_hdr: expires = 3518 >> 0(5493) PRESENCE:build_str_hdr: subs_expires : 3518 >> 0(5493) PRESENCE: build_str_hdr: headers: >> Event: presence.winfo >> Contact: <sip:200.13.225.250:5060> >> Subscription-State: active;expires=3518 >> Content-Type: application/watcherinfo+xml >> >> 0(5493) PRESENCE:notify: headers:Event: presence.winfo >> Contact: <sip:200.13.225.250:5060> >> Subscription-State: active;expires=3518 >> Content-Type: application/watcherinfo+xml >> >> 0(5493) CONTACT = sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:17116 >> 0(5493) presence:uandd_to_uri: uri=sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> 0(5493) parse_rr_body(): No body for record-route >> 0(5493) PRESENCE: notify:Send notify for presence on callback 1(5494) >> DEBUG: timer routine:4,tl=fc5c9a80 next=0, timeout=353600000 >> 1(5494) DEBUG: retransmission_handler : request resending (t=fc5c9910, >> NOTIFY si ... ) >> 1(5494) DEBUG:tm:set_timer: relative timeout is 1000000 >> 1(5494) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[5]: fc5c9a80 (354600000) >> 1(5494) DEBUG: retransmission_handler : done >> 1(5494) DEBUG: timer routine:5,tl=fc5c9a80 next=0, timeout=354600000 >> 1(5494) DEBUG: retransmission_handler : request resending (t=fc5c9910, >> NOTIFY si ... ) >> 1(5494) DEBUG:tm:set_timer: relative timeout is 2000000 >> 1(5494) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[6]: fc5c9a80 (356600000) >> 1(5494) DEBUG: retransmission_handler : done >> 1(5494) DEBUG: timer routine:6,tl=fc5c9a80 next=0, timeout=356600000 >> 1(5494) DEBUG: retransmission_handler : request resending (t=fc5c9910, >> NOTIFY si ... ) >> 1(5494) DEBUG:tm:set_timer: relative timeout is 4000000 >> 1(5494) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[7]: fc5c9a80 (360600000) >> 1(5494) DEBUG: retransmission_handler : done >> >> >> ******************************************************************************** >> Backtrace of the core: >> >> #0 0xfe7f77bc in shm_dup_subs (subs=0xffbff1b0, to_tag=Cannot access >> memory >> at address 0x96 >> ) at notify.c:1819 >> 1819 cb_param->wi_subs->to_user.s = (char*)cb_param + size; >> (gdb) bt >> #0 0xfe7f77bc in shm_dup_subs (subs=0xffbff1b0, to_tag=Cannot access >> memory >> at address 0x96 >> ) at notify.c:1819 >> #1 0xfe7f8238 in notify (subs=0x1779c8, watcher_subs=0x15, n_body=0x0, >> force_null_body=1024) at notify.c:1562 >> #2 0xfe7f8f18 in query_db_notify (p_user=0x234, p_domain=0xdff08, >> event=0xfe809a28 "presence.winfo", watcher_subs=0xffbff1b0, etag=0x0) >> at notify.c:957 >> #3 0xfe8028a8 in update_subscription (msg=0x175fd8, subs=0xffbff1b0, >> rtag=0xffbff228, to_tag_gen=1) at subscribe.c:476 >> #4 0xfe805080 in handle_subscribe (msg=0x175fd8, str1=0xffbff0e0 "", >> str2=0x800 <Address 0x800 out of bounds>) at subscribe.c:1252 >> #5 0x00018378 in do_action (a=0x145270, msg=0x175fd8) at action.c:883 >> #6 0x00019bb8 in run_action_list (a=0x145270, msg=0x175fd8) at >> action.c:131 >> #7 0x000192bc in do_action () >> #8 0x00019bb8 in run_action_list (a=0x1452c8, msg=0x175fd8) at >> action.c:131 >> #9 0x00019df8 in run_top_route (a=0x143e10, msg=0x175fd8) at >> action.c:111 >> #10 0x00043b60 in receive_msg (buf=0x12dc00 "", len=1024, >> rcv_info=0xe0400) >> at receive.c:156 >> #11 0x0006f294 in udp_rcv_loop () at udp_server.c:465 >> #12 0x000338bc in main_loop () at main.c:834 >> #13 0x00035c44 in main (argc=9, argv=0xe7800) at main.c:1399 >> (gdb) quit >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> http://lists.openser.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20071102/46b3b1ac/attachment-0001.htm >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 2 >> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 14:23:18 -0700 >> From: "Brian Heath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] MediaProxy 1.9.0 - Radius >> To: <[email protected]> >> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; >> reply-type=response >> >> If you've stopped using MediaProxy, what do you use now? I'm >> currently >> seeking an alternative to MediaProxy, and would appreciate some ideas. >> All >> I need is NAT traversal - but something does doesn't route media (voice) >> through the OpenSER server... >> >> Thanks, >> Brian >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Jeremy McNamara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "Mike O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Cc: <[email protected]> >> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 7:30 AM >> Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] MediaProxy 1.9.0 - Radius >> >> >>> Mike O'Connor wrote: >>>> Hi Guys >>>> >>>> I really think there is something wrong with MediaProxy, I can not get >>>> the radius or the mysql accounting to report any details, as best as I >>>> can see there is never any attempt to even try. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> I totally scratched MediaProxy off of the list when the author of the >>> code told me to take my questions to the openser mailing list. >>> Good luck finding support - I even offered to pay and was completely >>> ignored. >>> >>> >>> My suggestion would be to use Asterisk as your media proxy and use one >>> of the various radius connectors (if you absolutely require radius) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Jeremy >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 3 >> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 17:30:10 -0400 (EDT) >> From: Chris Heiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] Forking Madness >> To: Juha Heinanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Cc: [email protected] >> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed >> >> And let me throw one more wrench into the mix: >> >> On Fri, 2 Nov 2007, Chris Heiser wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, 2 Nov 2007, Juha Heinanen wrote: >>> >>>> Chris Heiser writes: >>>> >>>>> Call comes in for user A: >>>>> - Use avp_db_load to find that user A wants to parallel fork to 123 >>>>> and 456 >>>>> - Call to 123 fails because there's no registration >>>>> - Call to 456 times out >>>>> >>>>> == At this point we serial fork to the next step which might hbe >>>>> - Just call my cell >>>>> >>>>> What's unclear to me is how to actually achieve this logic. I mean, >>>>> getting the initial parallel fork is quite simple using avp_pushto. >>>> >>>> you can add permanent registrations for the aor of the user pointing to >>>> 123, 456 and your mobile number. just make sure that q value of the >>>> mobile >>>> is lower that q value of 123 and 456. >>>> >>> >>> if 123 and 456 are registered endpoints, how do I influence their q >>> value? >>> >>> And lets complicate things more, what if I wanted to call 123 first, >>> then >>> my cell, then 123 again? >>> >>> Would I solve all this by adding permanent registrations that point back >>> to OpenSER for registered endpoints, etc...? So a user would have a >>> bunch >>> of permanent registrations with decreasing q values that point into >>> OpenSER, PSTN gateway, Voicemail, etc...? >> >> >> What if I want to adjust the timers for each step based on some users' >> preference? I could see doing something ugly and overloaded like: >> >> Add contacts with USER-TIMEOUT as permanent subscriptions, add a >> t_on_branch, and in the branch, rewrite the RURI to remove the timeout >> and >> set the invite timer properly. I don't even know if that will work >> nicely. >> >> If I knew the Q value before t_relay, I could have avps assigned per q >> value to set the timeout dynamically. >> >>> >>>>> Comments? Ideas? Thoughts? Am I totally insane? Should I be using >>>>> a >>>>> specific module for this? >>>> >>>> you should be able to accomplish the above this using lcr modules's >>>> load_contacts()/next_contacts() functions. >>>> >>>> -- juha >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >>> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 4 >> Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 08:10:57 +1030 >> From: Mike O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] MediaProxy 1.9.0 - Radius >> To: CSB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Cc: [email protected] >> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 >> >> HI CSB >> >> 1.7.2 using mysql worked, but version since then do not save the updates >> via mysql to the radacct table. >> >> So I thought I would try radius and this does not work. >> >> I'm talking a clean install here. Totally new machine minimum change to >> the config. >> >> It just does not work >> >> Mike >> >> >> CSB wrote: >>> I've got an earlier version working. Is your problem just with 1.9.0? >>> >>> Cameron >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike O'Connor >>> Sent: Saturday, 3 November 2007 12:36 a.m. >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: [OpenSER-Users] MediaProxy 1.9.0 - Radius >>> >>> Hi Guys >>> >>> I really think there is something wrong with MediaProxy, I can not get >>> the radius or the mysql accounting to report any details, as best as I >>> can see there is never any attempt to even try. >>> >>> There is nothing in the logs about there being anything wrong at all. >>> >>> I had added print statement thought out the code and I can see that the >>> code for both mysql update and the code for sending radius updates never >>> gets call. >>> >>> I have not been able to find the connection between the radius or mysql >>> thread and the rtphandler but the print statement a in the actual calls >>> to the mysql or radius and the print messages are never seen in the >>> logs. >>> >>> Other prints added by me do get logged. >>> >>> Has any one actual tried the current code and got do the stop updates ? >>> >>> Mike >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 5 >> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 18:17:57 -0400 >> From: "Ovidiu Sas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] MediaProxy 1.9.0 - Radius >> To: "Brian Heath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Cc: [email protected] >> Message-ID: >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> >> Hi Brian, >> >> The other alternative is rtpproxy. Check the nathelper module. >> It can control multiple rtpproxy servers hosted on several machines: >> http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.3.x/nathelper.html#AEN160 >> This feature will be available on the next 1.3 release (scheduled by >> the end of the year) >> >> >> Regards, >> Ovidiu Sas >> >> On 11/2/07, Brian Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> If you've stopped using MediaProxy, what do you use now? I'm >>> currently >>> seeking an alternative to MediaProxy, and would appreciate some ideas. >>> All >>> I need is NAT traversal - but something does doesn't route media (voice) >>> through the OpenSER server... >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Brian >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Jeremy McNamara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "Mike O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Cc: <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 7:30 AM >>> Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] MediaProxy 1.9.0 - Radius >>> >>> >>> > Mike O'Connor wrote: >>> >> Hi Guys >>> >> >>> >> I really think there is something wrong with MediaProxy, I can not >>> >> get >>> >> the radius or the mysql accounting to report any details, as best as >>> >> I >>> >> can see there is never any attempt to even try. >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > I totally scratched MediaProxy off of the list when the author of the >>> > code told me to take my questions to the openser mailing list. >>> > Good luck finding support - I even offered to pay and was completely >>> > ignored. >>> > >>> > >>> > My suggestion would be to use Asterisk as your media proxy and use one >>> > of the various radius connectors (if you absolutely require radius) >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Jeremy >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Users mailing list >>> > [email protected] >>> > http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >>> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> >> End of Users Digest, Vol 30, Issue 6 >> ************************************ >> > > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > > End of Users Digest, Vol 30, Issue 7 > ************************************ > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
