There is bug mistakenly introduced about 2 years ago, if I could spot it right on the svn log. A wrong variable for registrar address was used. I have just made a commit on trunk. Can you test and let me know if works now? If you need patch for 1.3 I can send it to you -- I will backport after some testing is done.
Thanks, Daniel On 02/05/08 11:37, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > On Tuesday 05 February 2008 10:08:16 Dan-Cristian Bogos wrote: > >> Iñaki, >> >> it looks like I have misunderstood your problem. >> >> I was speaking about "202 Accepted" confirmation and not a new MESSAGE. >> > > Yes, that was what I meant ;) > > > >> Why would you need a new message? >> > > Because it's the only way that any UAC will show the notification to its > user. > For example: > > - If X-Lite sends a MESSAGE and it's stored and replied by proxy with "202 > Accepted" then XLite UI will show nothing to the user, but message correctly > received by destination, so he will think that the destinaiton is ireceiving > him messages but ignoring them. > > - If the message is stored and proxy replies "404 User Not Found, MEssage > Stored" then XLite will just show in the UI: "404 User is not online". > > - Twinkle will not show the code description for a 202, but it will do it in > a > negative reply (404 for example), but Twinkle IM is not very advanced yet in > usability terms. > > > Best regards. > > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
