Dear Iñaki Sorry for the phrasing, yes I meant in case of symmetric NAT would mediaproxy solve the natting problem. I got the main idea, thanks a lot for your help
Thx -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Iñaki Baz Castillo Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 2:27 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] OpenSer and NAT On Monday 11 February 2008 13:04:35 Ali Jawad wrote: > Dear Iñaki > > Thanks for your quick reply, you have stated that STUN is transparent and > once applied OpenSER modules wont detect NAT and therefore wont act upon > the packets. You also said that both solution can work together. > Let's > suppose that STUN did not help a NAT client.. What does mean "STUN did not help a NAT client"? STUN doesn't work behind a NAT symetric router. In any other NAT type router it works. Anyway, the clients performs a NAT test and if they discover that they are behind a symmetric NAT router they warn the user about they cannot use STUN. > in that case the proxy module > of openser would kick in and start acting right ? Rtp/MediaProxy are solutions that force the audio going through a server with public IP. Also nathelper module makes fix the private IP's in the original message ("Contact", "Via"...). -- Iñaki Baz Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
