Hi Juha, This will be definitely a better solution as it will be more efficient from load point of view - the question is how portable (general supported) is the TCP keepalive setting - this will need some investigation.
Regards, Bogdan Juha Heinanen wrote: > Bogdan-Andrei Iancu writes: > > > I was paying some second thoughts to some discussions we had some time > > ago, about embedding some automation for some very standard behaviours, > > in order to reduce the scripting complexity..... > > I will attack this issue during the next week IRC meeting. > > one thing that was considered earlier, was turn on tcp keepalive option > in those OSes (e.g. linux) that support it. it would solve NAT keepalive > issue for those UAs that don't support CRLF keepalive defined in > outbound. > > for AUs closing the connection, the best cure is to not use them. > > -- juha > > > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
