Hi Inaki, I have already read it but probably missed this important detail. Thanks for the advice. I will read it again more carefully.
Best regards, Shie Quoting Iñaki Baz Castillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > El Sábado, 15 de Marzo de 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: >> Hi Inaki, >> >> Then what should I do if I get the following error: >> SIP/2.0 481 Call Leg/Transaction Does Not Exist >> >> When both caller and callee are online? > > And why do you assume that it's a fail related to the "To" header? > > RFC 3261 > 21.4.19 481 Call/Transaction Does Not Exist > > This status indicates that the UAS received a request that does not > match any existing dialog or transaction. > > > Also read how a UA tries to match an incoming request to an existing > transaction: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3261#section-17.2.3 > > > >> WeSIP receive the request with the real From uri but the To uri >> contains the IP of openser server. >> Is this the correct situation? > > Sincerely, you should read the RFC 3261 to understand that the "To" header is > usually not examinated by the UAS, just the Request-Uri. But you cannot > asumme something incorrect without reading about it and later ask "then > what?". > > ;) > > > > > -- > Iñaki Baz Castillo > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.openser.org > http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
