Right.... minimising cost is priority #1... and in this particular case the
cheapest route is NOT used.
----- Original Message ----
From: Andreas Sikkema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@lists.openser.org
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 5:20:08 PM
Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] LCR Routing.... Choosing Best Route
On Mar 28, 2008, at 12:38 AM, Douglas Garstang wrote:
> However, when you get routes from multiple carriers, they don't
> always bill on the same prefix boundaries. In my example above, LCR/
> Carierroute would match against Carrier1 for anything starting with
> 1650. HOWEVER, since 165 is also applicable (165 means 1650, 1651
> and so on), and in this example cheaper, you should route 165 over
> Carrier 2.
>
> What do people do in this case?
It's called LCR for a reason, so I think minimizing cost should be
priority 1. Once price has stopped being the differentiator other
factors could be taken into account. Maybe price and other costs have
to aggregated?
--
Andreas Sikkema
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
