Hi Ovidiu, Thanks for that!
Regards, Bogdan Ovidiu Sas wrote: > Hello all, > > I updated the README file for this particular flag. > > Regards, > Ovidiu Sas > > On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi Iñaki, >> >> by "failure" it means a failure of the "relay" action - so, if t_relay() >> is not able to forward the request (due internal error, bad RURI, bad >> message, etc), with no 0x02 flag, the t_relay() function will >> automatically send back a negative reply and return true in script. Of >> course, this behaviour does not allow you to do any kind of failure. >> >> So, the idea is about the type of failure - it is a forward error (when >> nothing was put on network) and not a SIP failure (negative reply or >> timeout). >> >> Regards, >> Bogdan >> >> Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: >> >>> Hi. I read in "t_relay" doc: >>> >>> -------- >>> 0x02 - do not internally send a negative reply in case of failure. It >>> applies >>> only when the transaction is created. By default one is sent. Useful if you >>> want to implement a serial forking in case of failure. >>> -------- >>> >>> Could you please explain it a little more? I use failure_route with >>> append_branch and before it OpenSer doesn't send back a negative reply to >>> caller (in fct it would end the transaction). What the purpose of this bit >>> option? >>> >>> Thanks a lot. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> > > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
