El Lunes, 9 de Junio de 2008, Anatoly Pidruchny escribió: > Daniel, > > thank you, that works! But then, currently it does not make any sense to > call t_relay() with a parameter when $du is set, because the parameter > is going to be ignored. The priority of either $du or the parameter of > t_relay() is not really clear from the documentation. But, IMHO, the > parameter of t_relay function has to have greater priority then $du. Any > comments? Should I open a bug report for this?
I agree with you. It makes sense that a explicit destination set as "t_relay()" parameter should be the final destination instead of Route headers. Please, report a bug about it :) -- Iñaki Baz Castillo _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
