Hi All I had a lot of problems with STUN and symmetric NAT. The thing is that it does not always work with symmetric NAT. That would be mostly routers based on Linux IPTABLES.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bogdan-Andrei Iancu Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 11:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: users@lists.openser.org Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] stun Hi Pezhman, If I'm not wrong STUN cannot cross symmetric nats - it is one of its limitations. Regards, Bogdan Pezhman Lali wrote: > > --- On Mon, 6/9/08, Pezhman Lali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> From: Pezhman Lali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: stun >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Date: Monday, June 9, 2008, 6:02 PM >> Dear, >> does setting the ip of stun server in the sip-phones, >> behind the symmetric nat, make the problem ? >> my experience with stund 0.96, said yes. >> the stun server, can detects the type of nats properly, but >> the sip-phones behind the un-symmetric nat, can not >> register, or one-way calling. >> >> ???? >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.openser.org > http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
