I would rather have the more generally useful `oc export | oc create` path fully vetted an working. The amount of work ought to be the same in the end, right? Some work has been done upstream to make `export` fully featured, but its not fully tested.
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Michal Fojtik <[email protected]> wrote: > How about having something like: $ oc move projectA projectB where this > will do what David mentioned and also remove everything in projectA? > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 4:41 PM, David Eads <[email protected]> wrote: > >> No. Names in OpenShift and Kubernetes are immutable. You can try `oc >> export all --all -n old-namespace | oc create <exported file> -n >> new-namespace -f -`, but its not a fully vetted path. >> >> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Philippe Lafoucrière < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I need to rename a project, and the underlying namespace. Is there a way >>> to do that? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Philippe >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users >> >> >
_______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
