Hello, i'd like to know if you have ETA to release the fix, i found out
it's already merged (https://github.com/openshift/openshift-sdn/pull/285) .


---
Diego Castro / The CloudFather
GetupCloud.com - Eliminamos a Gravidade

2016-04-07 12:29 GMT-03:00 Ben Parees <[email protected]>:

>
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 10:58 AM, v <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> We made it.
>> The following things had to be done after the upgrade:
>> -install origin-node package (with its dependencies like docker etc.) on
>> the master host and get the origin-node service running
>> -add a DNS entry for the name of the new node on the master host
>>
>> However, we could have saved ourselves nearly 3 days of troubleshooting
>> if it were documented anywhere that that with the upgrade to origin 1.1 you
>> need to install the origin-node package on the master host. Using Openshift
>> without an enterprise contract has been a terrible experience for us.
>>
>
> ​Thanks for the feedback and sorry for your struggles.  We'll make sure to
> get the docs updated.
> ​
>
>
>
>>
>> Regards
>> v
>>
>>
>> Am 2016-04-07 um 16:08 schrieb v:
>>
>> Hello
>>
>> we saw an interesting message on "openshift ex diagnostics" and installed
>> the origin-node package on our master (which used to be only a master
>> without the origin-node package before the upgrade to 1.1.4).
>>
>> When we use "oc new-app" with an image from our registry we now get:
>> error: can't look up Docker image "172.30.35.180:5000/abc/xyz:latest":
>> Internal error occurred: Get https://172.30.35.180:5000/v2/: dial tcp
>> 172.30.35.180:5000: *no route to host*
>>
>> When we use "telnet 172.30.35.180 5000" from our master we also get "*no
>> route to host*"! It seems like we are closing in on the issue and we
>> only need to get the SDN working on our master.
>>
>> However, when troubleshooting the SDN we did not find any obvious errors.
>> Do we need to add some iptables rules to our master to allow him to join
>> the SDN? Any help would be highly appreciated!
>>
>> Best Regards
>> v
>>
>> Am 2016-04-05 um 18:04 schrieb v:
>>
>> Am 2016-04-05 um 17:53 schrieb Ben Parees:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:44 AM, v <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> we have upgraded to OS 1.1.4 and we are getting the following error
>>> message when using oc new-app to start an app which uses an image from our
>>> registry:
>>>
>>> oc new-app 172.30.35.180:5000/abc/xyz:latest
>>> error: can't look up Docker image "172.30.35.180:5000/abc/xyz:latest":
>>> Internal error occurred: Get <https://172.30.35.180:5000/v2/>
>>> https://172.30.35.180:5000/v2/: dial tcp 172.30.35.180:5000: network is
>>> unreachable
>>> error: no match for "172.30.35.180:5000/abc/xyz:latest"
>>>
>>> Howerver, the following things work:
>>> -oc new-app with an image from docker.io
>>> -pushing to the registry (docker login, docker push)
>>> -telnet 172.30.35.180 5000 works from all nodes
>>>
>>> This is a very weird error because telnet works. And the error only
>>> started appearing after the upgrade. Any help would be highly appreciated.
>>>
>>
>> ​do you have any http_proxy/https_proxy env variables configured?
>> ​
>>
>>
>>
>>> Regards
>>> v
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ben Parees | OpenShift
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> We thought of that possibility too. But we don't use a proxy:
>> ps -eF | grep docker
>> root        6503       1 10 1767802 153628 1 13:15 ?       00:29:32
>> /usr/bin/docker daemon --insecure-registry=172.30.0.0/16
>> --selinux-enabled --log-level=warn --storage-driver devicemapper
>> --storage-opt dm.fs=xfs --storage-opt
>> dm.thinpooldev=/dev/mapper/docker--vg-docker--pool --storage-opt
>> dm.use_deferred_removal=true -b=lbr0 --mtu=1450
>>
>> Is there any other place where http_proxy/https_proxy env variables could
>> be configured other than in the global docker daemon settings? Or anything
>> else which could cause that?
>>
>> Regards,
>> v
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing 
>> [email protected]http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing 
>> [email protected]http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Ben Parees | OpenShift
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
>
>
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users

Reply via email to