I have the same issue on 1.3.1 when a node goes down. Looks like a refactor on attach/detach controller [1] is going on for a while. Clayton, do you know if it is going to land on 1.4 ?
1. https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/33660 --- Diego Castro / The CloudFather GetupCloud.com - Eliminamos a Gravidade 2017-01-12 11:19 GMT-03:00 Clayton Coleman <[email protected]>: > If you do see behavior with ceph locks like that please file a bug - most > of the serious issues were fixed in 1.3 but we definitely want to ensure no > such issues are still occurring. > > On Jan 12, 2017, at 6:40 AM, James Wilkins <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Out of interest, assuming your using ceph RBD’s – do you hit an issue > where by the locks don’t correctly ‘move’ when a container migrates? > Historically we’ve had to clean up manually with rbd lock list / remove the > lock to permit the pod to move properly. > > > > Admittedly, we haven’t tested this since 1.2 > > > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [ > mailto:[email protected] > <[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Diego Castro > *Sent:* 10 January 2017 15:59 > *To:* Philippe Lafoucrière <[email protected]> > *Cc:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: ceph pv > > > > Hello. > > You can use pv without worrying about secrets if you create a keyring file > on each node at /etc/ceph/ceph.client.openshift.keyring and point the pv > object to it: > > > > apiVersion: v1 > > kind: PersistentVolume > > metadata: > > name: mypv > > labels: > > size: 1024 > > spec: > > capacity: > > storage: 1024 > > accessModes: > > - "ReadWriteOnce" > > rbd: > > monitors: > > - "osm-0:6789" > > - "osm-1:6789" > > - "osm-2:6789" > > pool: rbd > > image: mypv > > user: openshift > > keyring: /etc/ceph/ceph.client.openshift.keyring > > fsType: ext4 > > readOnly: false > > persistentVolumeReclaimPolicy: "Retain" > > > > For more information to create a ceph user: http://docs.ceph.com/docs/ > giant/rados/operations/user-management/#managing-users > > > > > > > --- > > Diego Castro / The CloudFather > GetupCloud.com - Eliminamos a Gravidade > > > > 2017-01-09 17:42 GMT-03:00 Philippe Lafoucrière < > [email protected]>: > > > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 3:42 AM, James Eckersall <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Our use case would be utilisation of openshift clusters with untrusted > clients in distinct projects, so we’re trying to ensure they can’t access > each/others storage. > > > > We are in the same situation, and we generally let our clients access > their projects without permissions for secrets :) > > > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users > > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users > >
_______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
