Hey David,

Thanks for reporting this!

I've confirmed the problem using the skopeo tool and am asking around about
a resolution. The build date looks pretty recent, so it's possible that the
old version was rebuilt and therefore ended up as the "latest" - give us
some time to investigate & we'll provide an update here.

$ skopeo inspect docker://registry.access.redhat.com/openshift3/ose
{
    "Name": "registry.access.redhat.com/openshift3/ose",
    "Tag": "latest",
    "Digest":
"sha256:7595da041b4871d90de6f3c98a629a62c85eb22ae194824f3f16b306b79e49c4",
    "RepoTags": [
        "v3.3.1.20",
        "v3.3.0.34-1",
        "v3.5.5.5",
        "v3.5.5.8",
        "v3.3.1.4-1",
        "v3.3.1.19-2",
        "v3.3",
        "v3.2",
        "v3.1",
        "v3.1.1.10-2",
        "v3.5",
        "v3.4",
        "v3.3.1.11-2",
        "v3.2.1.13-1",
        "v3.2.1.21-1",
        "v3.2.0.44-2",
        "v3.2.1.4",
        "v3.2.1.7",
        "v3.2.1.9",
        "v3.4.1.5-2",
        "v3.3.1.3-1",
        "v3.4.1.2-2",
        "v3.5.5.5-2",
        "v3.1.1.8-1",
        "v3.2.1.17-1",
        "v3.2.1.26-2",
        "v3.4.0.39-2",
        "v3.2.0.20",
        "v3.4.1.16-2",
        "v3.1.1.6-19",
        "v3.1.1.6-16",
        "v3.1.1.6-17",
        "v3.1.1.6-14",
        "v3.1.1.6-15",
        "v3.1.1.6-12",
        "v3.1.1.6-10",
        "v3.3.0.32-2",
        "v3.1.1.7-0",
        "v3.2.0.20-3",
        "v3.3.1.7-0",
        "v3.2.1.4-1",
        "v3.4.1.18-4",
        "v3.2.1.30-3",
        "v3.3.1.14-1",
        "v3.3.1.20-5",
        "v3.2.1.9-3",
        "v3.2.1.7-1",
        "v3.1.1.11",
        "v3.1.1.10",
        "v3.1.0.4",
        "v3.1.0.4-3",
        "v3.1.0.4-2",
        "v3.1.0.4-1",
        "v3.3.1.5-2",
        "v3.4.0.40-1",
        "v3.3.0.35-1",
        "v3.3.1.17-2",
        "v3.3.1.17-4",
        "v3.2.0.46-2",
        "v3.4.0.39",
        "v3.4.0.40",
        "v3.1.1.11-2",
        "v3.2.1.31-2",
        "v3.4.1.7",
        "v3.4.1.5",
        "v3.4.1.2",
        "v3.3.1.19",
        "v3.4.1.7-2",
        "v3.3.1.11",
        "v3.2.0.46",
        "v3.3.1.14",
        "v3.3.1.17",
        "v3.4.1.18",
        "v3.2.1.28-3",
        "v3.4.1.16",
        "v3.4.1.10",
        "v3.4.1.12",
        "v3.2.1.13",
        "v3.1.1.8",
        "v3.2.1.17",
        "v3.2.1.15",
        "v3.1.1.7",
        "v3.1.1.6",
        "v3.2.1.15-1",
        "v3.4.1.12-3",
        "v3.2.0.44",
        "v3.2.1.1-2",
        "v3.4.1.10-3",
        "v3.5.5.8-3",
        "v3.1.1.6-3",
        "v3.2.1.26",
        "v3.2.1.23",
        "v3.2.1.21",
        "v3.2.1.23-2",
        "v3.2.1.28",
        "v3.1.1.6-21",
        "v3.2.1.31-4",
        "v3.3.1.3",
        "v3.3.1.5",
        "v3.3.1.4",
        "v3.3.1.7",
        "v3.2.1.1",
        "v3.2.1.30",
        "v3.2.1.31",
        "v3.3.0.34",
        "v3.3.0.35",
        "v3.3.0.32",
        "latest"
    ],
    "Created": "2017-04-21T03:54:53.292638Z",
    "DockerVersion": "1.12.6",
    "Labels": {
        "Component": "openshift-enterprise-base-docker",
        "architecture": "x86_64",
        "authoritative-source-url": "registry.access.redhat.com",
        "build-date": "2017-04-21T03:53:16.493374",
        "com.redhat.build-host": "ip-10-29-120-40.ec2.internal",
        "com.redhat.component": "openshift-enterprise-docker",
        "description": "The Red Hat Enterprise Linux Base image is designed
to be a fully supported foundation for your containerized applications.
This base image provides your operations and application teams with the
packages, language runtimes and tools necessary to run, maintain, and
troubleshoot all of your applications. This image is maintained by Red Hat
and updated regularly. It is designed and engineered to be the base layer
for all of your containerized applications, middleware and utilites. When
used as the source for all of your containers, only one copy will ever be
downloaded and cached in your production environment. Use this image just
like you would a regular Red Hat Enterprise Linux distribution. Tools like
yum, gzip, and bash are provided by default. For further information on how
this image was built look at the /root/anacanda-ks.cfg file.",
        "distribution-scope": "public",
        "io.k8s.description": "Atomic OpenShift is a platform for
developing, building, and deploying containerized applications.",
        "io.k8s.display-name": "Atomic OpenShift Application Platform",
        "io.openshift.tags": "openshift,core",
        "name": "openshift3/ose",
        "release": "4",
        "summary": "Provides the latest release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux
7 in a fully featured and supported base image.",
        "vcs-ref": "93bead7bfc5c6fc324c9eccf4c57aafa777ab989",
        "vcs-type": "git",
        "vendor": "Red Hat, Inc.",
        "version": "v3.2.1.31"
    },
    "Architecture": "amd64",
    "Os": "linux",
    "Layers": [

"sha256:8642dd241e54ecb57f49345f135e9bcedb0546e7e61c1ca4d0008a9925f50444",

"sha256:fdd633d880f736958e14a036256b2def325acf6b438b7c849139fe92d5cbe4ce",

"sha256:259ae1077db31339999252fc2885b0f537aee9c2685612da3a78bc113360067a",

"sha256:fd719c82e1c8e843d24a80b9441e218b11bf586515d5808dc321c20de590ee20"
    ]
}


On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 9:06 AM, David Schweikert <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am a bit puzzled by the fact that doing a docker pull on:
>
>    registry.access.redhat.com/openshift3/ose:latest
>
> Fetches version v3.2.1.31:
>
>    $ docker inspect -f '{{.Config.Labels.version}}'
> registry.access.redhat.com/openshift3/ose
>    v3.2.1.31
>
> However, it should be v3.5.5.8 according to this page:
>
>    https://access.redhat.com/containers/?tab=tags#/
> registry.access.redhat.com/openshift3/ose
>
> Anybody else seeing this?
>
> Cheers
> David
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
>



-- 
Jonathan Yu / Software Engineer, OpenShift by Red Hat / @jawnsy
<https://twitter.com/jawnsy>

*“There are a million ways to get rich. But there’s only one way to stay
rich: Humility, often to the point of paranoia. The irony is that few
things squash humility like getting rich in the first place.”* — Morgan
Housel, Getting Rich vs. Staying Rich
<http://www.collaborativefund.com/blog/getting-rich-vs-staying-rich/>
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users

Reply via email to