The all-in-one path David is referring to (openshift start) is not used by
minishift (which uses of cluster up).

There will be a replacement path for the core functionality of running a
single master in a VM, we’re still working out the details.  The end goal
would be for an equivalent easy to use flow on a single machine that is
more aligned with the new installer, but we aren’t there yet.

On Oct 1, 2018, at 9:31 AM, Fernando Lozano <[email protected]> wrote:

Without all-in-one, how will minishift work? I assume we still want an easy
to use option for developers.

On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 10:12 AM subscription sites <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi David,
>
>
> so there will not be a possibility anymore to install on one host? Also no
> alternative for the use-cases that all-in-one covers today, such as
> experiment with openshift?
> Basically, the "oc cluster up" command disappears?
>
> Also: is this kind of decisions available somewhere online, like a public
> roadmap for the product?
>
> Kr,
>
> Peter
>
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 2:08 PM David Eads <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> In the release after 3.11, the all-in-one will no longer be available and
>> because it isn't considered a production installation, we have no plans to
>> provide a clean migration from an all-in-one configuration.
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 3:56 PM Aleksandar Kostadinov <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Here my personal thoughts and experience. Not some sort of official
>>> advice.
>>>
>>> subscription sites wrote on 09/29/18 18:40:
>>> > Hello,
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > I'm wondering with regard to the all-in-one setup:
>>> > - I know the documentation doesn't say it's considered production, but
>>> > what would the downside be of using this on a VPS to host production
>>> > apps? Except for the lack of redundancy obviously, the host goes down
>>> > and it's all down, but my alternative would be to not use openshift
>>> and
>>> > use plain docker on one host, so availability isn't my premium
>>> concern.
>>> > Is it not recommended from a security perspective, considering how
>>> it's
>>> > setup using "oc cluster up", or are there other concerns for not using
>>> > it in production?
>>>
>>> Except for missing on HA and running some non-app resources (console,
>>> node, controllers, etcd, router, etc.), then I see no other drawbacks.
>>>
>>> > - When setting up an all-in-one on an internet-exposed host, how can
>>> you
>>> > best protect the web console? Isn't it a bit "light" security wise to
>>> > just depend on username/password for protection? Is there a
>>> possibility
>>> > to use multifactor or certificate based authentication? I also tried
>>>
>>> Depends on how you choose and manage your password. For more options you
>>> can try to use keycloak auth provider. This should allow you to setup
>>> 2-factor auth IIRC.
>>>
>>> > blocking the port with iptables and using ssh with port forwarding,
>>> but
>>> > this doesn't seem to work, both if I set the public-master option to
>>> the
>>> > public ip or localhost?
>>>
>>> How does it fail when you set to localhost?
>>>
>>> I assume using some sort of VPN can also help but I don't see why `ssh`
>>> shouldn't work. An alternative would be to use `ssh -D` to proxy your
>>> traffic through the remote host and setup your browser to use that socks
>>> server when accessing console. But still think normal port forwarding
>>> should do the job.
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Thanks for any help you can provide!
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Regards,
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Peter
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > users mailing list
>>> > [email protected]
>>> > http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
>>> >
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
>
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users

Reply via email to