Bogdan-Andrei Iancu schrieb: > Hi Iñaki, > > If I'm not wrong, it's it the "maddr" param what you are looking for. > Without aiming a bias, I was also evaluating the option to store the > original contact and to restore it back.
Technically, I think maddr can be used (and there is some vendor equipment which uses it) and is probably the easiest way to implement this feature. But I think from the semantic point of view using maddr (=multicast address) is misleading, as it is defined for usage of SIP with multicast. regards klaus > > Regards, > Bogdan > > Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: >> 2008/11/7 Schumann Sebastian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >>> Hi Inaki >>> >>> Yes, you are right. Seems my changes work where they should (all same type >>> of phones where modification has to take place, Contact header somehow >>> "well-defined") but are not universal. >>> >>> I will take your inputs to improve my used functions. Thanks! >>> >> I suggest you to study the SIP URI BNF grammar in RFC 3261. It's really >> complex. >> >> Regards. >> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
