Hi, Sorry for double posting for the same problem. This second post was meant to nail down on the exact issue for the first post. I am very sorry for any inconvenience caused.
Inaki, In the 200OK received by the nated client, the Contact is :Contact: < sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:33756> Opensips did not add the Record-Route even though I did specify fix_nated_contact in on_reply_route. Do you have any idea why that is the case? Thanks alot for all your help. JB On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > El Miércoles, 26 de Noviembre de 2008, Juan Backson escribió: > > I am having a problem with using B2BUA -> Opensips -> xLite behind NAT. > > When the B2BUA sends back a 200OK, it is received by the SIP client > behind > > NAT, but the SIP client does not response properly with ACK when the > xLite > > is not in the same local LAN as the Opensips. If xLite is connected > within > > the local LAN of Opensips, then xLite can response properly with ACK. I > > think this is due to Contact header not properly configured, but I did > use > > fix_nated_contact() inside the onreply_route[1]. > > > Well, how is the Contact the callee receives in the 200 OK? > Does OpenSIPS add Record-Route? > > -- > Iñaki Baz Castillo > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
