For MediaProxy1 you need one machine for each 200 active sessions. For
MediaProxy 2 you can use one machine only. I cannot speak for RTP
proxy, you have to ask their developers
Adrian
On Nov 27, 2008, at 2:51 PM, Woody Dickson wrote:
Hi Adrian,
Sorry, I don't mean to offense anyone when I incorrectly used the
term poorly. Please accept my apology.
I would like to use either MediaProxy or RtpProxy to proxy 1-2K
concurrent sessions. Is this a realistic number for either one?
Could someone comment on the performance, scalability, and ease-of-
use between the two?
Thanks,
Woody
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Adrian Georgescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
projects.com> wrote:
Woody,
Statements that things behave poorly out of concrete context do not
really help anyone.
The question is how many sessions to you want to handle? Can you
answer this simple question? Then someone might be able to help you.
Adrian
On Nov 27, 2008, at 1:46 PM, Woody Dickson wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to decide on whether to use RtpProxy or MediaProxy for
my current opensips implementation. Previously MediaProxy was
known to perform poorly under high loard. Now with the latest 2.0
release, does anyone know how does MediaProxy compare to RtpProxy
in terms of performance, scalability, and ease-of-use?
I would appreciate any insight on this.
Thanks,
Woody
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
