Hi Mark, with SRV you move most of the logic on the client side, becoming dependent of it - like if it supports SRV, how often a SRV lookup is done, etc. Also, using SRV implies your opensips boxes have different IPs - this might be a problem because of the RR during a call. If a call is established through the opensips1 with IP1, the dialog will contain the RR with IP1; after a switch to the opensips2 during the call, the second proxy will not by default recognize the IP of the other server.
with LVS you are fully self sustained - you do not have any dependency of the used device , but such a setup is more complex (as all the HA is on your side, as provider). So, this is more complex from setup and managing point of view, but it is doable. Personally I'm in favour of LVS or similar solution as I do not like to have my platform depending of the uac capabilities. Regards, Bogdan mark morreny wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently considering using either SRV or LVS to fail-over and > load balance two Opensips. > > I understand SRV requires the client phone to support the specific > RFC, so is LVS a better solution? > > Which one is typically used in a real world implementation? > > Thank you in advance for your suggestion. > > Regards, > Mark > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
