Hi Brett, Brett Nemeroff wrote: >>> So I look for things like the $rd after calling cr_route. But if I do >>> this, sometimes on re-invites, the IPs are reversed. Also, sometimes >>> I've had carrier switches ACK with a different IP (That I don't >>> recognize, but is valid). >>> >>> >> But the carrier is select when routing the initial request (the INVITE) - >> why do you need this information in the ACK or re-INVITE acc records? >> > > Since I'm logging failures as well as success, I see a few invites.. > So I can't take the first one.. it failed.. Would it be 'syntactically > correct' if I take the first invite that returned 200? > yes, you have a reply code in the acc record. > I haven't tried logging with the missed flag.. I'm not sure how it get > written any differently when you use it.. I'll try it out.. >
it is not differently written - it simply produce a new acc record (in missed_calls table) when a branch of the transaction fails. Regards, Bogdan _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
