Brett Nemeroff wrote: > Bogdan, > RURI modified by carrierroute, then t_relay(). Far end replies with > 503. Call carrierroute again, which errors since the only other route > has a prob=0. ok, but after the cc fails, you sent out a reply with t_reply() or you let the received 503 to propagate to the UAC? > Without the failed_transaction_flag actually armed before the > failure_route, I get no database activitiy at all.. so, if you set it before the failure_route it works, otherwise ok, right?
Regards, Bogdan > > Nothing else is using that flag. I have it set at the top of my > failure_routes and my main acc flag set at the very top of the main > routing block. > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:36 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi Brett, > > the transactions you miss in the acc are replied in failure_route > with t_reply() or you are passing the received reply ? > > also, are you sharing the "failed_transaction_flag" with other flags ? > > Regards, > Bogdan > > Brett Nemeroff wrote: > > Hello All, > I'm going to reply to my own message. I'm not sure if the > upgrade actually had anything to do with this, but I suspect > it did.. > > I log everything, failed, missed, acked, etc into one acc > table. I was setting the acc flag right at the very very top > of my script to just catch everything. > > Well this worked great in 1.4, but in 1.5, it seems that > failed transactions were getting skipped... > > I always had the failed_transaction_flag defined, but I only > set that flag in my failure route. For some reason, I wasn't > getting failed transactions ever. > > It's also notable that I used the carrierroute function, with > only one valid route, the secondard route (domain) had a > probability of 0 (ie: disabled). That may have contributed to > this? > > Anyway, I set the failed transaction flag at the top of the > script as well, and it's working how I had expected. Not sure > if something else broke when I did that, but my typical call > flows seem to be logged properly now. > > -Brett > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Brett Nemeroff > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: > > Hey All, > So I've recently upgraded my 1.4 install to 1.5 and I've > noticed, > I don't get INVITEs that are replied with a 503 stored in ACC > anymore, the whole transaction is missing. > > I used to get those. I haven't changed any of my acc params. :/ > > Am I missing something? > Thanks, > Brett > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
