Hi again, o Stefan Sayer [05/07/09 13:33]: > Hi Bogdan, > > o Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [05/07/09 11:01]: >> Hi, >> >> The Amoocon conference ended ! >> >> The presentations were uploaded on the OpenSIPS web site, so you can >> browse them at : >> http://www.opensips.org/Events/Amoocon2009 > > >... >>>> Covered topics are : Load-balancing (using the new load-balancer module) >>>> , Presence (deploy presence) and clustering (OpenSIPS + PBX integration): >>>> >>>> (1) Load balancing Workshop: >>>> http://www.amoocon.de/talks/8 > > I must say I have not looked into the code but only at > http://www.opensips.org/pub/events/2009-05-04_Amoocon_Rostock/OpenSIPS_LoadBalancing.pdf > but I am not convinced: For load balancing that could be done > statelessly wrt SIP dialog you are keeping dialog state at the LB. > > If you have control over the media servers (as you do with > freeswitch/asterisk/yate you mentioned) the same could be achieved much > simpler by periodically reporting current load (e.g. in extra header to > OPTIONS response or any other SIP message) from the media servers to LB > and keeping that information as soft state there. > sorry this sounds so negative which it wasn't meant to be... rather I was wondering about whether load_balancer module could be used in another mode without dialog with alternate source of load information.
Stefan > > Stefan > -- Stefan Sayer VoIP Services [email protected] www.iptego.com IPTEGO GmbH Wittenbergplatz 1 10789 Berlin Germany Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 101010 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Alexander Hoffmann _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
