On Monday 25 May 2009, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > Dan Pascu wrote: > > On Monday 25 May 2009, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > > > >> Hi Dan, > >> > >> I was evaluating this for a long time (to hide from the script the whole > >> Cancel processing - both requests and replies), but by doing this we > >> will not be able to log any info about the cancelling even....but to be > >> honest I do not know if is anybody needing it. > >> > > > > I'm not sure what you mean here. Are you speaking of the possibility to use > > xlog() inside the if (t_was_canceled()) test to log that the processed request > > was already cancelled? > yes, this kind of stuff. > > > If so, I really doubt that it is useful in any manner. > > If it was cancelled, I don't want to get in the failure_route in the first > > place. > > > > to be honest I do not also make use of such logging, but I'm not sure > what is the opinion of others.
The argument is that once a request was cancelled, all further processing should stop, including failure routes. The following 487 should simply be forwarded upstream, as the user should not interfere with it and transform it in something else in the failure route. -- Dan _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
